Page 4 of 4

Re: Anyone else notice this?

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2023 4:37 am
by poodling around
JerryVan wrote: Wed Nov 08, 2023 2:42 pm
Thatphonographguy wrote: Wed Nov 08, 2023 2:26 pm I did not reach out to Walt. But Walt reached out to me. Although I'll never know what he had to say because he removed the message he sent before I could see it and when I try to Inquire of him just what it was all about, I am prompted by a message that says he will not receive my message. Interesting........
Yes, interesting. I wonder if it had anything to do with your public review of his product in your initial posting. :roll:
Oh JerryVan - this made me laugh !

... and so early in the morning I nearly spilt my first coffee of the day ! Very droll !! :D

Re: Anyone else notice this?

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2023 4:58 am
by epigramophone
When comparing the merits of different "makes" of new old stock needles, it is worth remembering that irrespective of whose name appears on the tin, they were made by a few specialist manufacturers and supplied to the gramophone trade.
Since 1902 The Gramophone Company had bought their needles from William Hall & Co of Studley and, apart from a brief flirtation with Zimmerman in Germany, they continued to do so until the end of production in 1963. I am sure that they were not Hall's only customer.

Re: Anyone else notice this?

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2023 1:38 pm
by Thatphonographguy
I gave Chamberlain a second chance at the expense of only a couple dollars. Received the needles yesterday night. I went through the entire pack and found absolutely no duds. Possibly I received a bad batch from a different supplier? Supplier changed? Hard telling. But the product looks great. I've been wrong many times, and this won't be my last. If John is indeed part of the forum, I offer my apology and a thank you. This is exactly the quality that I expect of a new batch of steel needles. Hopefully things stay consistent in the future.