Thank you gentlemen for pointing out those
differences in the cells. From quickly looking
it up, the Edison-Lalande cell uses a solution
of Potassium Hydroxide (caustic potash) as
the electrolyte.
It appears to be a variation on the basic
"copper oxide" cell. Quoting from "Primary
Batteries" copyright 1891 by Henry S. Carhart: "The copper oxide is employed in
the form of a compressed slab, which, with
its connecting copper support, serves also
as the negative plate. Two of these plates
are enclosed in a copper frame, on the longer
arm of which, is the binding post. A hard
rubber safety plug in the middle prevents the
zinc plate on either side from making contact
with the copper oxide and copper supporting
frame".
So, it would seem from the above that
the plates are copper oxide (-), and zinc (+)
It also goes on to say that the voltage per
cell of these is 0.7 volt. This explains why
you'd need four of them wired in series in
order to get 2.8 volts.
Compare that with the voltage of the bichromate cell, which is slightly more than
2 volts per cell. This is why it takes only
one grenet cell to power up a class M, where
as it takes 3 or 4 Edison Lalande cells in
series.
But, it would seem to me from looking at
the remains of many of those old cells that
there very possibly could be enough of the
plates left that all they would need would
to be cleaned up and have fresh electrolyte
added.
At the very worst case, in some cases new
plates might have to be made. But the framework is there for them, the containers
are there.
I would hope that somehow, some day that
there will be enough interest to actually
get a few of those old batteries working
again. Wouldn't that be neat to fit a newly
made blank on a class M (made from the correct 1888 wax formula of course), and power it up using the old cell(s), and then
make a recording and play it back?
Lots of work, I know, but certainly worth
all the effort.