
Bruce
Saw your beauties being built back in the day! Toured the old Jeep planted in Toledo. I see a lot of these Cherokees floating around yet. I don't think it was imagined they were THAT good. jeep needed to refresh it's image so , out with the old in with the new.gregbogantz wrote:I have a 1993 Jeep Cherokee that has hauled all the pieces in my collection that haven't been delivered by UPS or FedEx. This original Cherokee design (not the bloated Grand version) was the most efficient and practical utilitarian vehicle ever made by Jeep. And I don't know of another brand that shares its complement of features. They quit making this model in 2002, probably because they couldn't charge enuf money for the old, practical, well-hashed-out design. It was the dumbest thing Mopar has done because they never made a replacement for it. The Grand and the Commander are bloatmobiles, and the other Jeeps are too small. The back seat folds down for increased cargo area, so I can get some pretty big cabinets in the Cherokee (Victor Credenza, E.H. Scott AW-23 in the Waverly Grande cabinet, Capehart 111N2, Capehart 406H, E.H. Scott 800-B in the Chippendale cabinet, Philco 38-690, Edison C-2, and the Philco 42-1016 which is massive - it was a tight squeeze but made it), yet it has a very tight turning radius which is real useful in negotiating the mountain roads and driveways around where I live. Not to mention the utility of the high ground clearance and the 4-wheel drive. Also cheap to buy since Mopar got their body panel tooling costs out of it in the late 1980s when it first came out. Totally practical transporter, and it even gets decent mileage on the highway with the port-injected 4 liter straight-6 (which they also don't make anymore, alas) and the 5-speed manual transmixer with overdrive. Great for pulling a trailer, too, which I've done on occasion. If I could, I'd buy a brand new Cherokee. But, alas, Mopar has abandoned the utilitarian market. Much to the chagrin of the U.S. Forest Service who used to drive a lot of them down here in the mountains. So I'll be keeping this already 20 year old vehicle until the wheels fall off. I just had the brakes rebuilt after 190,000 miles, so it should be good for a few more.
What a wonderful dilemma to have!!m0xiemama wrote:Would someone call my mom and instruct her on how to fit a VTLA and an XVI L door in a 4runmer? She doesn't want to bring them both here next week but I don't want to wait for either one.
How about a picture of the 28?De Soto Frank wrote:1928 Ford 49-A Special Coupe. ( When there's no salt on the roads )
Not real good for hauling anything bigger than a Gem or Columbia Q...
For larger stuff, I have used my "daily-driver" '97 Jeep Grand Cherokee (4 litre six) with good results.
Back in my college days (late 1980's), I brought home my first Edison machine, an S-19, in the back seat of my 1948 Chrysler New Yorker - we tipped it on its side, and gently slid it in head-first on the back seat cushion. Those suicide-doors on the rear were really handy for loading stuff into the rear passenger area.
De Soto Frank