Orchorsol wrote:The EMG and Expert horns were direct developments of Percy Wilson's "modified exponential" theory, as published in Wilson & Webb: Modern Gramophones and Electrical Reproducers (1929) - here's a scan of the relevant pages.
Thanks for the paper! It seems intentionally written for
not being understood, perhaps for reasons of trade secret. As far as I understand, the assumption is that the sound waves may not be planar but spherical, and the usual exponential function used to design a horn is modified accordingly. (Good sense tells me that, under these assumptions, if the throat and mouth are to be kept equal, the "new" horn has to be a bit shallower in the center section and with a more rapid flare rate at the mouth, which is later confirmed). Quite obviously, the "new" formula is still an exponential function, just as the previous one. The author then tries to simplify the new formula a bit, by introducing some approximations. After that, it is concluded that the "new" horn envelope is almost identical to the "old" one, but lies slightly inside of it (which confirms my previous deduction).
Before coming to the new pictures, which are excellent and a marvel to look at, please let me put as a side note that these EMGs are so peculiar that the first time that I've seen a picture of a unit (obviously on the internet - I had never read before about this brand and its peculiarities on books) I thought that it was a mock-up made to fool someone, or one of those stupid internet fakes.

Had I find one at a local flea market, I would have probably passed and laughed at it as the ultimate crap-o-phone.

You really learn new things every day, and you should never jump to conclusions too quick.
Now, the pictures. It is very, very hard to judge by the shape of a flaring horn wether it is indeed exponential or not. First of all, the exponential function is not a finite curve, but has an infinite length, so only a section of it is used to design real horns in real world (what makes the tractrix curve so appealing to my physicist's eyes is that it is a curve that has a real
end on one side, and it's a
vertical end, but I'm digressing). So, depending on the parameters fixed for the design, and also on which section of the exponential curve it is used, a truly exponential horn may look indistinguishably similar by (say) a circular or a quadratic one. Even exact measures may hardly reveal the difference. However, it is still my opinion that (at least some of) these oversized horns have an odd, irregular contour. Everything looks quite all right up to the end of the elbow; then the horn axis gets horizontal and the final flare begins. In that point, I seem to see a quite abrubpt change of curvature, and the final flare definitely looks not expanding quick enough. But, as said, exact measures of the cross-sections at progressive points may prove that I'm completely wrong. In any case, should this irregular curvature eventually proven to be true, and should it have deployed intentinally by EMG, it does
not come anyway from the "modified exponential" theory, which still is a pure exponential function.