Page 8 of 11
Re: Future of the hobby
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 4:53 pm
by krkey1
This is why more so then ever we need books on fakes
Re: Future of the hobby
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 5:07 pm
by gramophone-georg
CarlosV wrote:krkey1 wrote:billybob62 wrote:The problem is that there is plenty of good reliable stuff on the low or beginner end but as tastes develope towards more desirable phonographs, the product isn't there. The really nice stuff is getting priced too high for the average Joe. That's the sad truth.
It's like house prices. How will our kids and grandkids afford a house? They will turn their backs on the McMansions.
I had honestly never thought of it that way. There are finite amount of high quality original machines and demand is growing. Someone is bound to fake them.
On the subject of desirable and scarce machines, I have seen Berliner trade marks made in the 70s or 80s that are very hard to discriminate from the real ones; one that was for sale in the annual trade meeting in Germany looked original, until I looked under it to see hex nuts fixing the motor - these machines utilized square nuts. Only then the seller conceded that it was a repro, and told that it was made 30 years ago. The rest of the machine looked authentic, down to worn leather elbow, aged varnish and faded felt, which is scary.
I've been practically trying to give away my trusty old Berliner late trademark with no success. I've been wondering if maybe it's a reproduction, but what's left of the big paper decal on the bottom told me "probably not".
Then, on the basis of your post I decided to look at my nuts (chortle) and they are indeed very aged square ones.
If it was proven to be a repro I'd still be happy with it... reproduction parts and all. I've just been trying to sell because I also have a G&T New Style No. 3 that I am "conserving" that can and will play a 10" record, and I only have one Nipper so I figured the No. 3 could win the contest for versatility.
Maybe I should just buy another Nipper and go stereo.
Pretty sure the No. 3 isn't repro because it came from our friend Zwebie some time back. If it IS a fake then I don't feel bad cos it fooled him, too!

Re: Future of the hobby
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 5:34 pm
by Django
I believe that most of the fake Berliners are the 1898 model and the Japanese machines have metric threads and a paper decal. They all have the same serial number on the sound box too. I am not sure that they were meant to deceive. I think they were sold as new reproductions.
I have an Australian reproduction Berliner that is even more convincing, Imperial threads and all. I bought it as a reproduction because I like them and I would never spring for a real one, (since then I have acquired 2 authentic trademark machines). I made my own reproduction Clark-Johnson sound box for it. I would never try to pass it off as real, but some day, someone might.
Many Berliners are a mix of new and old, but the value is still high because they are iconic and beloved. I really like that repro Berliner of mine.
Re: Future of the hobby
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2017 6:13 pm
by Django
The Berliner with the larger Nipper is a real machine from France, the sound box and elbow are repros. The other machine is my Australian reproduction complete with home made sound box. There are a few features that will let you know that it is a reproduction, but the motor and castings would probably fool just about anyone. The Royal and the other machines are authentic with the exception of the aluminum horn on the Eagle.
Re: Future of the hobby
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 6:10 pm
by Green Mountain Bill
A couple of thoughts from me.......
So valuable have some coins become that they must be certified to be sold. The shape of each number of the date, the idiosyncrasies of each dot and curl on Miss Liberty's head, and the style of the mint mark is examined in great detail to establish authenticity. When phonographs of my poor little collection collection reach that level of value, I will be long gone.
I for one can't wait to have a 3-D printer available in my shop that will allow me to scan and reproduce broken pot metal parts in order to keep antique phonographs and radios working. I have a long list of machines waiting for parts and I would gladly create a missing lever or gear to get them working again. After all, a broken, silent phonograph is just a door stop.
Green Mountain Bill
P.S.: After the A.I. Singularity of 2046 occurs, will anyone really want to have my VE-9-40X to play Othophonic Scrolls or be able to find an AM radio station to listen to?
Re: Future of the hobby
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 7:10 pm
by krkey1
Green Mountain Bill wrote:A couple of thoughts from me.......
So valuable have some coins become that they must be certified to be sold. The shape of each number of the date, the idiosyncrasies of each dot and curl on Miss Liberty's head, and the style of the mint mark is examined in great detail to establish authenticity. When phonographs of my poor little collection collection reach that level of value, I will be long gone.
I for one can't wait to have a 3-D printer available in my shop that will allow me to scan and reproduce broken pot metal parts in order to keep antique phonographs and radios working. I have a long list of machines waiting for parts and I would gladly create a missing lever or gear to get them working again. After all, a broken, silent phonograph is just a door stop.
Green Mountain Bill
P.S.: After the A.I. Singularity of 2046 occurs, will anyone really want to have my VE-9-40X to play Othophonic Scrolls or be able to find an AM radio station to listen to?
No issues from me, we just want to know what was done for value reasons.
Re: Future of the hobby
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:15 pm
by Curt A
Quote from Green Mountain Bill: "So valuable have some coins become that they must be certified to be sold."
Exactly, and for good reason... A phono collector friend of mine is also a clock/watch collector repairman and buys gold and silver coins as well. I was in his shop one day and he handed me a shoebox full of what appeared to be American silver dollars with dates ranging from the 1800s into the 1920s. He asked me my opinion of them and I used to collect coins so looked them over and except for a couple, they appeared to be in excellent condition.
He surprised me by saying the whole box were counterfeits from China, made of brass and silver plated. He said the only way you could tell was by weighing them and the fakes were just a hair off of one ounce, which the originals are not. He also said the new ones coming from China are now the correct weight, so all you could do was scratch them and see if they were brass underneath (obviously, you wouldn't want to do that with a coin that was being sold for numismatic value and not scrap value).
Since he also works on clocks and watches, he said that there are many fakes in that hobby. To prove it, he sold me a self winding Rolex that looked absolutely authentic with the correct band for $40... He said that it would have to be disassembled and examined internally to actually determine that it was a fake...
Re: Future of the hobby
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:22 pm
by Curt A
A few years ago, a skilled furniture maker decided to hand make an exact reproduction of a dresser that originally was made by a famous maker in Philadelphia in the 1700s. His intended purpose was to hand make it, age it and see if he could fool the Smithsonian experts... He went to the extent of finishing the piece, stripping it, then painting it with an original type of milk paint and stripping it again, this after leaving the raw wood piece in a swamp for a month. After that he placed it in a chicken coop to let it really age with chicken droppings and dust. He cleaned it up and took it to the Smithsonian and was told that he had discovered a very rare early piece made by a famous maker... so, if they can be fooled, we can be too.
Re: Future of the hobby
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:05 pm
by TinfoilPhono
You may be thinking of a very famous fake in the Henry Ford Museum.
Financial gain is arguably the most obvious reason why someone would go through the trouble of creating a forgery. But sometimes money isn’t the motivation. Sometimes, the goal is simply to show that reproducing a high-quality work can be done — and to put an arrogant art expert in his or her place. This was apparently the case when a Rhode Island man made a very convincing Great Chair that fooled many antiques authorities for several years.
Armand LaMontagne, a self-taught artist, is now known for his hyper-realistic sculptures of famous athletes. But in 1969, LaMontagne reportedly used his woodworking skills to fabricate a throne-like, 17th-century armchair with impressively turned spindles. LaMontagne was careful to pay attention to such details as using green oak that warped when the wood dried out, and wooden pins based on those made in the Colonial era to hold elements of the chair together. He also is said to have used various techniques to “age” the chair, as any wooden object that was to have survived several centuries would need to show heavy wear.
As the story goes, LaMontagne took no money for his Great Chair, but placed it in a house in Maine where he felt it would catch the eye of antiques enthusiasts — and it did. The chair exchanged hands and was eventually sold to the Henry Ford Museum in 1970 for $9,000 as a Brewster Great Chair. The highly prized acquisition was thought to have been built for William Brewster, one of the founders of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Powerful men of Brewster’s time were the ones who owned “great” chairs, showing off their high status in the community.
The artful prank came to light in 1977 after an article in The Providence Journal highlighted LaMontagne’s deceptive endeavor and described a chair that matched the one in the Henry Ford Museum. The museum investigated and after extensive analysis was performed on the chair, it was concluded that it was, in fact, a modern creation. The Henry Ford Museum decided to make lemonade from lemons. The museum kept the chair and have used it as a teaching object for inquisitive visitors, lending it to other exhibitions that explore the stories behind great fakes.
LINK
The last few times I've been there the fake chair has been on exhibit, with a sign telling the story. Nice to know they are willing to show that they aren't perfect.
Re: Future of the hobby
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:47 pm
by jboger
I know well the story go the Brewster chair. It's recounted in a book about Fakes and Frauds, a very interesting book. I'm not so sure that this fake was thought to be owned by Brewster himself. There is another chair, genuine, that has some claim to actually be his chair. But the term Brewster has come to mean a certain type of great chair, one with turned spindles above and below the seat, otherwise the chair is known as a Carver. As for the fake silver dollars, one should be able to do the ring test. It works for copper and silver coins. One balances a coin on the tip of a finger and taps it gently with another coin. If genuine, it will ring; if counterfeit, no ring. This is a non-invasive technique that does no damage to the coin.