Page 1 of 1
What is considered a Trade Mark Machine
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:17 pm
by pappde
Just before this year is over I would love to have a nice lovely discussion to sign off 2012
When it comes to Berliner gramophones, what would you consider as a Trademark Machine?
The purist definition is the easiest, i.e. the machine Barraud received from Owen and painted; a machine with the second type side brake (the lever kind), a brass horn and a "Gramophone Company 31 Maiden Lane" transfer (but manufactured in the US).
The "non" purist definition is much more difficult.
Would you include the "swing"brake earlier or the bolt brake later model?
What about the different horns?
Canadian, European?

Re: What is considered a Trade Mark Machine
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:06 pm
by gramophone78
You may want to revisit your past thread on this...."Berliner Versions". There are also threads on Berliner reproducers, horns and record nuts that show and discuss this in great detail.
Hope this helps.
Re: What is considered a Trade Mark Machine
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:13 pm
by phonogfp
Since the "Trade Mark" term is latter-day collectors' nomenclature, I'd expect both your "purist" and "non-purist" definitions would be popular. For myself, I'd simplify it to any Berliner "Improved Gramophone" (the term used at the time) using the original U.S. type motor/exposed spring cage machine, whether assembled in the U.S. or Europe; side-brake or top brake; with any belled Berliner horn.
I'm not as comfortable using the "Trade Mark" term for machines with spring cages that differ from the original design, either European or Canadian. That's just one collector's perspective...
George P.
Re: What is considered a Trade Mark Machine
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:21 pm
by Starkton
phonogfp wrote:For myself, I'd simplify it to any Berliner "Improved Gramophone" (the term used at the time) using the original U.S. type motor/exposed spring cage machine, whether assembled in the U.S. or Europe; side-brake or top brake; with any belled Berliner horn.
George P.
George, I expected this well-balanced opinion from you, and I applaud it.
Re: What is considered a Trade Mark Machine
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:39 pm
by gramophone78
George, I agree also on your comment. However, I must add I have not found a Berliner (Gramophone) I didn't like. Improved or not....

.
Re: What is considered a Trade Mark Machine
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:20 pm
by phonogfp
gramophone78 wrote:George, I agree also on your comment. However, I must add I have not found a Berliner (Gramophone) I didn't like. Improved or not....

.
Agreed - - any Berliner (Gramophone) is a good Berliner!
George P.
Starkton wrote:
George, I expected this well-balanced opinion from you, and I applaud it.
You're very kind. Like a broken clock, I get it right twice a day - - I must have gotten lucky this time! Thanks Stephan - -
George P.