Page 1 of 1
Pugh gramophone
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 5:03 pm
by gregbogantz
Did I miss the discussion already, or have you guys been asleep at the keyboards? Can you Brits tell us anything about this unusual Pugh gramophone?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 0378900492
This certainly took a lot of effort to make that curly-Q tonearm. And that reproducer made of wood - including the diaphragm and needlebar - has got to be something to see. And the NINE FOOT ! sound path thru that curly tonearm, together with that fairly deliberate looking horn must be something to hear.
Re: Pugh gramophone
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 5:40 pm
by MordEth
Re: Pugh gramophone
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:47 pm
by phonophan79
Wow, that is a crazy machine! It looks lovely, but crazy! Huge horn!
Re: Pugh gramophone
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:20 pm
by Aaron
This machine is quit strange but very beautiful!
Aaron
Re: Pugh gramophone
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:09 pm
by gramophoneshane
There's actually a thread on this machine, on Steve's UK board. It certainly is a unique design.
http://gramophones.proboards.com/index. ... thread=431
Re: Pugh gramophone
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:33 pm
by MordEth
Shane,
Thanks for linking that—I looked for it briefly there (because Richard mentioned it when I was talking to him earlier) but I didn’t find it; the search feature returned zero results for ‘Pugh’, which was the keyword that I used.
I’m surprised that the seller doesn’t lead off with a different first picture—on first glance at the listing I thought it was just a rather nice, but otherwise ordinary, cabinet made by a lesser-known company. It’s not until the second photo that you see that it’s more of a curiosity.
— MordEth
Re: Pugh gramophone
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:38 am
by wjw
Very interesting machine.It almost looks alive! I wonder if Pugh had been aware of the Keenophone design similarity. I also wonder how many of these things were produced. Constructing that tone arm must have eaten some hours of labor!
It should allow for much better low frequency response than most anything on the market from its time. Too bad the stylus bar is so massive. It surely must limit the highs.
Re: Pugh gramophone
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:44 am
by Valecnik
I would like to hear it. Appears that design might also cause undue record wear. Certainly very interesting. Bet they did not sell many of them.
Re: Pugh gramophone
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 5:52 am
by B.B.B
And now it's going to China. For a neat sum of 1643 american dollars. Plus S&H (probably just as much

)
This is a very strange machine. Looks absolutely lovely IMO.
Re: Pugh gramophone
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:50 am
by Steve
B.B.B wrote:And now it's going to China.
Or is it? I've already queried this. Something just doesn't quite gel with me about this auction. It is a stunning machine and at any other time and with a lot more space I'd have bought this and maybe been prepared to bid a lot higher on it to get it. My problem is that for me to buy it, I would have to sell one of my existing cabinets so the fun of getting something unique like this gets spoilt by losing another great machine in its place! Oh well, one day....
Incidentally this machine was bought by the current seller from Ebay about 2 years ago in a very poor state. If I recall correctly he acquired it for about £250? He's put some work into the cabinet and now been very handsomely rewarded for his efforts.
I obviously hadn't heard it but I can't imagine it would sound very impressive because the design is hopelessly flawed (and that's why it never took off) not to mention costly to produce. The long tone-arm will suffocate the sound and not allow it to expand due to its parallel bore. The designer nearly got it right with the additional length but nearly is not enough! The most successful aspect would probably be the wooden horn but the soundbox too is a flawed design. It has relatively little mass and seems to rely on the rigidity of the arm to keep it in place which, as Bruce says above, will result in serious record wear. As we all know (now) the mass of a soundbox is fairly critical and hence why the best handmade soundboxes like "Expert" used much heavier brass bodies.
It was bound to be better than a Duophone machine though and for my money it perfectly represents that fundamentally quirky post WW1 attempt to improve the gramophone by any means available which would spawn the 1920-24 period when many British "gramophone makers" came and went so quickly. Flawed concept? Certainly. Weird, wonderful and possibly unique? Almost certainly. Do I wish I owned it? Don't get me started!......
