Page 1 of 1
Let's all use correct terminology (including me!)
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:14 am
by Jerry B.
The discussion of the unusual Exhibition reminded me that there can be confusion between a Victor horn machine and a Victrola. When we write about a horn machine such as a Victor IV, we should always write Victor IV instead of an abbreviated Vic IV. The same is true with a model IV Victrola. We should always write Victrola IV or VV-IV. It becomes confusing when someone makes the statement that the unusual Exhibition was found on the Vic IV. Was the writer talking about a Victor IV or a VV-IV? I am not pointing fingers because I have been as guilty as anyone. Jerry
Re: Let's all use correct terminology (including me!)
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:17 am
by alang
I understand your point Jerry, but Victor wasn't really too good in that perspective either. My Victor II "Humpback" says "Vic II" on the data plate. But I agree that it makes statements easier to understand if textbook terminology is used.
Andreas
Re: Let's all use correct terminology (including me!)
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 1:08 pm
by dutchman
Does this mean we cannot ask anymore questions about whatchamacallits, or the doflop thing under the whatchamacallit?

Re: Let's all use correct terminology (including me!)
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 1:11 pm
by alang
No, I think it's more about the cherry wood Edison Cylinder Roll Victrola from Columbia

Re: Let's all use correct terminology (including me!)
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 1:56 pm
by Jerry B.
The confusion is most common when talking about the Victor IV and VI and Victrola IV and VI. The ID tags on horn machines frequently say Vic II or IV but I think all Victrola tags say VV-IV. I don't have a Victrola IV or VI. Does anyone have one that says Vic IV? Jerry
Re: Let's all use correct terminology (including me!)
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:04 pm
by Valecnik
All good points Jerry but pretty "hoity toity" for someone who just got his finger whacked off by an Amberola 30!

Re: Let's all use correct terminology (including me!)
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:59 pm
by debndunk
Hang on a minute,if we're on the subject of terminology why do you guy's across the pond call a gramophone a phonograph?

Gordon.
Re: Let's all use correct terminology (including me!)
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 3:26 pm
by Jerry B.
I've had my thumb elevated for most of the days so I have plenty of time to think about these details.

Re: Let's all use correct terminology (including me!)
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 3:52 pm
by Starkton
debndunk wrote:Hang on a minute,if we're on the subject of terminology why do you guy's across the pond call a gramophone a phonograph?

Gordon.
Eldridge Johnson dropped the designation "gramophone" for legal reasons and chose "Victor," combined with the neutral term "talking machine," instead. Therefore, "Victor gramophone" is as historically incorrect as "Victor phonograph."
Re: Let's all use correct terminology (including me!)
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:48 pm
by whoopinola
While Victor in the US dropped the "Gramophone" term , all Victor "Talking Machines"sold in Canada up to 1923 had a separate "Berliner Gramophone" tag attached