Label Change

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Post Reply
User avatar
pappde
Victor O
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:36 pm

Label Change

Post by pappde »

Hi All.
When did the label change?
I assume it must be around when the lawsuits begun, since it was then that using "gramophone" was prohibited by the court?
Attachments
I guess this is the "original" label.
I guess this is the "original" label.
DEC1897NewYork.jpg (391.5 KiB) Viewed 1776 times
I assume it was the latest before the celluloid version.
I assume it was the latest before the celluloid version.

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8005
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Label Change

Post by phonogfp »

No, the National Gramophone Company was reincorporated in March 1899 to the National Gramophone Corporation. Later Gramophones (1899-1900) sold in the U.S. will carry this "Corporation" decal.

George P.

tomwil
Victor I
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:38 pm

Re: Label Change

Post by tomwil »

I think he's asking why the change from "GRAMOPHONE" to "GRAM-O-PHONE"?

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8005
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Label Change

Post by phonogfp »

tomwil wrote:I think he's asking why the change from "GRAMOPHONE" to "GRAM-O-PHONE"?
That's a good question! Advertising of the 1890s through 1900 seemed to use both hyphenated and non-hyphenated versions arbitrarily.

George P.

User avatar
pappde
Victor O
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:36 pm

Re: Label Change

Post by pappde »

I dug though the net and I found a Google Book reference for the New York Supreme Court document that refers to the dissolution and transfer of all assets of the National Gramophone Company to the newly formed National Gramophone Corporation effective March 31, 1899. It is a lengthy and vey boring legal document and it really does not give the reason.
Here is the link:
http://books.google.com/books?id=4jErlo ... on&f=false

Denes

User avatar
FloridaClay
Victor VI
Posts: 3708
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:14 pm
Location: Merritt Island, FL

Re: Label Change

Post by FloridaClay »

I would suspect the usual reasons--limited liability and facilitation of public financing.

Clay
Arthur W. J. G. Ord-Hume's Laws of Collecting
1. Space will expand to accommodate an infinite number of possessions, regardless of their size.
2. Shortage of finance, however dire, will never prevent the acquisition of a desired object, however improbable its cost.

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8005
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Label Change

Post by phonogfp »

pappde wrote:I dug though the net and I found a Google Book reference for the New York Supreme Court document that refers to the dissolution and transfer of all assets of the National Gramophone Company to the newly formed National Gramophone Corporation effective March 31, 1899. It is a lengthy and vey boring legal document and it really does not give the reason.
The increased capitalization would allow for financing a new disc machine (eventually known as the Zonophone) and setting up recording & pressing operations separate from those of Berliner. Thanks for providing this link. I enjoyed reading about MacKay vs. Seaman.

George P.

mrphonograph
Victor I
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:56 pm

Re: Label Change

Post by mrphonograph »

phonogfp wrote:
pappde wrote:I dug though the net and I found a Google Book reference for the New York Supreme Court document that refers to the dissolution and transfer of all assets of the National Gramophone Company to the newly formed National Gramophone Corporation effective March 31, 1899. It is a lengthy and vey boring legal document and it really does not give the reason.
The increased capitalization would allow for financing a new disc machine (eventually known as the Zonophone) and setting up recording & pressing operations separate from those of Berliner. Thanks for providing this link. I enjoyed reading about MacKay vs. Seaman.

George P.

here the same thing once again zonophone or zon-o-phone this could be a ongoing story


tino

Starkton
Victor IV
Posts: 1116
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:00 am

Re: Label Change

Post by Starkton »

phonogfp wrote: Advertising of the 1890s through 1900 seemed to use both hyphenated and non-hyphenated versions arbitrarily.

George P.
That's right. The hyphenated version, probably inspired by Frank Seaman, was used from mid-1896 in advertising to distinguish between "Gram-o-phone" and "Graphophone".

Post Reply