Hi All.
When did the label change?
I assume it must be around when the lawsuits begun, since it was then that using "gramophone" was prohibited by the court?
Label Change
- pappde
- Victor O
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:36 pm
- phonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 8005
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: Label Change
No, the National Gramophone Company was reincorporated in March 1899 to the National Gramophone Corporation. Later Gramophones (1899-1900) sold in the U.S. will carry this "Corporation" decal.
George P.
George P.
-
- Victor I
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:38 pm
Re: Label Change
I think he's asking why the change from "GRAMOPHONE" to "GRAM-O-PHONE"?
- phonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 8005
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: Label Change
That's a good question! Advertising of the 1890s through 1900 seemed to use both hyphenated and non-hyphenated versions arbitrarily.tomwil wrote:I think he's asking why the change from "GRAMOPHONE" to "GRAM-O-PHONE"?
George P.
- pappde
- Victor O
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:36 pm
Re: Label Change
I dug though the net and I found a Google Book reference for the New York Supreme Court document that refers to the dissolution and transfer of all assets of the National Gramophone Company to the newly formed National Gramophone Corporation effective March 31, 1899. It is a lengthy and vey boring legal document and it really does not give the reason.
Here is the link:
http://books.google.com/books?id=4jErlo ... on&f=false
Denes
Here is the link:
http://books.google.com/books?id=4jErlo ... on&f=false
Denes
- FloridaClay
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3708
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:14 pm
- Location: Merritt Island, FL
Re: Label Change
I would suspect the usual reasons--limited liability and facilitation of public financing.
Clay
Clay
Arthur W. J. G. Ord-Hume's Laws of Collecting
1. Space will expand to accommodate an infinite number of possessions, regardless of their size.
2. Shortage of finance, however dire, will never prevent the acquisition of a desired object, however improbable its cost.
1. Space will expand to accommodate an infinite number of possessions, regardless of their size.
2. Shortage of finance, however dire, will never prevent the acquisition of a desired object, however improbable its cost.
- phonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 8005
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: Label Change
The increased capitalization would allow for financing a new disc machine (eventually known as the Zonophone) and setting up recording & pressing operations separate from those of Berliner. Thanks for providing this link. I enjoyed reading about MacKay vs. Seaman.pappde wrote:I dug though the net and I found a Google Book reference for the New York Supreme Court document that refers to the dissolution and transfer of all assets of the National Gramophone Company to the newly formed National Gramophone Corporation effective March 31, 1899. It is a lengthy and vey boring legal document and it really does not give the reason.
George P.
-
- Victor I
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:56 pm
Re: Label Change
phonogfp wrote:The increased capitalization would allow for financing a new disc machine (eventually known as the Zonophone) and setting up recording & pressing operations separate from those of Berliner. Thanks for providing this link. I enjoyed reading about MacKay vs. Seaman.pappde wrote:I dug though the net and I found a Google Book reference for the New York Supreme Court document that refers to the dissolution and transfer of all assets of the National Gramophone Company to the newly formed National Gramophone Corporation effective March 31, 1899. It is a lengthy and vey boring legal document and it really does not give the reason.
George P.
here the same thing once again zonophone or zon-o-phone this could be a ongoing story
tino
-
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:00 am
Re: Label Change
That's right. The hyphenated version, probably inspired by Frank Seaman, was used from mid-1896 in advertising to distinguish between "Gram-o-phone" and "Graphophone".phonogfp wrote: Advertising of the 1890s through 1900 seemed to use both hyphenated and non-hyphenated versions arbitrarily.
George P.