Page 1 of 6
Victrola 8-35 (1928) forgotten son of Credenza?
Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 4:34 pm
by marcapra
Re: Victrola 8-35 (1928) forgotten son of Credenza?
Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 4:58 pm
by alang
That is a beautiful machine, especially with the record albums. Looks very distinguished, like it belongs in a library.
Congratulations
Andreas
Re: Victrola 8-35 (1928) forgotten son of Credenza?
Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 8:41 pm
by estott
That is a first rate machine, and you are SO fortunate to have the albums
Re: Victrola 8-35 (1928) forgotten son of Credenza?
Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 9:15 pm
by De Soto Frank
estott wrote:That is a first rate machine, and you are SO fortunate to have the albums
Here-here !

Re: Victrola 8-35 (1928) forgotten son of Credenza?
Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 11:53 pm
by marcapra
Having good albums wasn't just fortune. It came with just three good Victor 10" albums. It took years of searching to get a complete set in good condition.
Re: Victrola 8-35 (1928) forgotten son of Credenza?
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:01 am
by Jerry B.
Very impressive machine. Just don't ask me to help move it! Jerry
Re: Victrola 8-35 (1928) forgotten son of Credenza?
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:26 am
by Cody K
I don't think the 8-35 is forgotten as much as it's just lesser known -- as you say, there are ten Credenzas for every 8-35 that turns up. So, it's quite likely that many fewer people have even heard of the 8-35 than have actually heard a Credenza in action.
In terms of style, the 8-35 wins hands down, in my book. It's lower than a Credenza, and that alone makes it more "modern" in appearance than the hulking Big C. The width, combined with the book-alike record storage lend it an air of the upper-crust that the Credenza has too, though in a different way. The Credenza looks like (or tries to look like) old money; the 8-35 looks like a young Wall Street upstart, setting up in Scarsdale (a minute before the crash).
I haven't had the privilege of comparing the two models side-by-side, and I don't imagine I ever will. But given the reviews of the 8-35's sound, and its less ponderous appearance, I think I might well choose the 8-35 over the Credenza.
Still and all, an 8-35 that's lost its "books" is much diminished as far as visual attractiveness goes. The albums are so much a part of its look, moreso than with any other phonograph I know of. Without them, it's kind of a weird hybrid of bookcase and phonograph, unlike the Credenza, which is just a gigantic monolith, records stored in it or not. I imagine that, once "obsolete", 8-35s that had lost their books -- and their looks -- were more likely to end up in the dump than a Credenza, which, as we see all the time, were repurposed for some pretty sketchy uses. That, and the fact there were fewer 8-35s in the first place, probably combine to make the 8-35 more scarce than forgotten.
You've got a beautiful, remarkable machine, in fine condition, and it's good to know it's safe in good hands. And major congratulations for having managed to assemble a full set of albums for it -- that's dedication!
Re: Victrola 8-35 (1928) forgotten son of Credenza?
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:19 am
by gemering
Awesome Machine!!!!
Re: Victrola 8-35 (1928) forgotten son of Credenza?
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:56 am
by Garret
Very beautiful piece. In my opinion, this is probably one of the best-sounding American phonographs made. It's also very large and heavy.
Re: Victrola 8-35 (1928) forgotten son of Credenza?
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:07 pm
by Yamaphone
It just so happens that I presently have a Victrola 835 with the horn out of the cabinet. With currant discussion about this machine, I thought it might be of interest to some members to see some photos of this horn, as it really is difficult to see it when in the cabinet.
Also, I tried to measure the length of this horn. With the tone arm (which I think adds about 12") the length comes to about 72". The opening measures 21" x 25".
Dan Z.