THE BUM SONG, DALHART

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
ambrola
Victor IV
Posts: 1502
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:20 am
Personal Text: Be Careful What You Say, You Can't T ake It Back!
Contact:

THE BUM SONG, DALHART

Post by ambrola »

Cylinder # 5653, the Bum Song # 2 by Dalhart, I can't find nothing about it. Is it worth anything? What year would the 5600's been made, 1927?

User avatar
FellowCollector
Victor V
Posts: 2039
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:22 pm
Contact:

Re: THE BUM SONG, DALHART

Post by FellowCollector »

Amberola wrote:Cylinder # 5653, the Bum Song # 2 by Dalhart, I can't find nothing about it. Is it worth anything? What year would the 5600's been made, 1927?
The 5600 series Blue Amberols were released in late 1928 and your #5653 was released in February 1929 as I recall. I have that cylinder as well but it is not in really nice condition unfortunately.

Doug

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: THE BUM SONG, DALHART

Post by Wolfe »

A dubbed Dalhart cylinder? Probably worth about 3 bucks.

52089
Victor VI
Posts: 3817
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 7:54 pm

Re: THE BUM SONG, DALHART

Post by 52089 »

Wolfe wrote:A dubbed Dalhart cylinder? Probably worth about 3 bucks.
No, IMHO not in this case. A lot of 5000 series Dalharts can be had fairly cheaply ($10 or so), but one this late is another story. Somewhere around 5650, Edison started dubbing cylinders using an electrical process, while at the same time cutting production back to miniscule numbers. My guess would be that only somewhere around 200-250 copies of this cylinder were ever made, and of course fewer than that survive. I don't think $50-$100 is unreasonable on ebay, and someone who needed it to fill a hole in their collection might pay more than that.

User avatar
VintageTechnologies
Victor IV
Posts: 1651
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:09 pm

Re: THE BUM SONG, DALHART

Post by VintageTechnologies »

In general, condition has a LOT to do with value.

ambrola
Victor IV
Posts: 1502
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:20 am
Personal Text: Be Careful What You Say, You Can't T ake It Back!
Contact:

Re: THE BUM SONG, DALHART

Post by ambrola »

52089 wrote:
Wolfe wrote:A dubbed Dalhart cylinder? Probably worth about 3 bucks.
No, IMHO not in this case. A lot of 5000 series Dalharts can be had fairly cheaply ($10 or so), but one this late is another story. Somewhere around 5650, Edison started dubbing cylinders using an electrical process, while at the same time cutting production back to miniscule numbers. My guess would be that only somewhere around 200-250 copies of this cylinder were ever made, and of course fewer than that survive. I don't think $50-$100 is unreasonable on ebay, and someone who needed it to fill a hole in their collection might pay more than that.
I agree. Any electrically recorded cylinder is hard to find. I just bought this one, and its supposed to be mint. I have gotten about 5 high number 5600's from this guy and they have all been great. He said this one had
The Bum Song - 2 written on it. I wonder what the 2 stands for?

52089
Victor VI
Posts: 3817
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 7:54 pm

Re: THE BUM SONG, DALHART

Post by 52089 »

Amberola wrote: He said this one had The Bum Song - 2 written on it. I wonder what the 2 stands for?
It's the second "Bum Song". The first is on BA 5605 sung by Eddie Kirk. That song and "Hallelujah, I'm a Bum" are commonly found coupled on disk. You can hear all of these on YouTube.

Phonofreak
Victor VI
Posts: 3720
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:00 pm
Location: Western, WA State

Re: THE BUM SONG, DALHART

Post by Phonofreak »

Wolfe wrote:A dubbed Dalhart cylinder? Probably worth about 3 bucks.
If you have one of those for 3 bucks, I'll buy it in a heartbeat!! :lol: :lol:
Harvey Kravitz

User avatar
celticguitar666
Victor I
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 9:27 pm
Personal Text: V V IXA ,Edison Amberola 30 Edison A150 Victor RE45 Radiola

Re: THE BUM SONG, DALHART

Post by celticguitar666 »

Phonofreak wrote:
Wolfe wrote:A dubbed Dalhart cylinder? Probably worth about 3 bucks.
If you have one of those for 3 bucks, I'll buy it in a heartbeat!! :lol: :lol:
Harvey Kravitz
What some thing should be worth and what some thing is worth (thanks to eBay) is some thing else. I see it all the time "Oh 78's or DD or Cylinders are only worth a couple of bucks" only to check the prevailing value per Ebay is a lot more sadly for us that just want them to listen to them not put them in our safety deposit boxes. That is what I do any way play them isn't that what they were made for?
sorry a little off topic but my two cents
Dwight :coffee: :monkey:
Hippocrates: Life is short, art long, opportunity fleeting, experience deceptive, judgment difficult.

ambrola
Victor IV
Posts: 1502
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:20 am
Personal Text: Be Careful What You Say, You Can't T ake It Back!
Contact:

Re: THE BUM SONG, DALHART

Post by ambrola »

celticguitar666 wrote:
Phonofreak wrote:
Wolfe wrote:A dubbed Dalhart cylinder? Probably worth about 3 bucks.
If you have one of those for 3 bucks, I'll buy it in a heartbeat!! :lol: :lol:
Harvey Kravitz
What some thing should be worth and what some thing is worth (thanks to eBay) is some thing else. I see it all the time "Oh 78's or DD or Cylinders are only worth a couple of bucks" only to check the prevailing value per Ebay is a lot more sadly for us that just want them to listen to them not put them in our safety deposit boxes. That is what I do any way play them isn't that what they were made for?
sorry a little off topic but my two cents
Dwight :coffee: :monkey:
It makes no difference if I pay 5.00 for a cylinder or 300.00 for a late 5600, I still play them. Your not going to hurt them if you have a good stylus. I see a lot of collectors that pay big money for a machine, but have no records worth anything. I like to collect the cylinders as much as machines and know the electrically recorded cylinders from 26 and 27 will hold their value. I just bought a cylinder off fleabay (Yes, We Have No Bananas) by the Green Bros Novelty Band for 30.00 in mint condition. I think that was a steal?

Post Reply