Page 1 of 2
Columbia Grafonola
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 2:02 pm
by ilm75dodge
Hi I am new to the crank phonograph world but my main hobby is restoring tube radios so I figure this isn't too far of a stretch! I picked up this Columbia Grafonola and am looking for information, parts and advice!! I emailed George Vollema (Great Lakes Antique Phonograph) and he was able to tell me is either model: a35, C or D. Also apparently I have incorrect tone arm/ reproducer.
It am taking over this project after someone else tried a horrible attempt at restoration! Does anyone know if this correct decal is being reproduced by anyone? I already ordered some white oak quarter cut veneer (not paper backed!) for the top! Also was the original finish satin, semi gloss or gloss?
http://s150.photobucket.com/user/ilm75d ... Phonograph
Re: Columbia Grafonola
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 2:24 pm
by Sidewinder
The decal inside the lid looks perfect, it would diminish the value of the machine to refinish the inside of the lid and replace a good original decal with a new reproduction.
The original tone arms on these sometimes had pot metal elbows that broke. The tone arm is a later Columbia style.
Good luck with the project. Impressive work with the rebuild in the photographs.
Re: Columbia Grafonola
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 2:55 pm
by Mr Grumpy
New decals are available here -->
http://phonodecal.com/decals/scripts/main1.php#null
Great job putting that machine back together. I'd be interested in knowing the model # as well, I have the same machine.
Re: Columbia Grafonola
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:54 pm
by Phonofreak
This Grafonola is either a late Model 35 or a Model C. If you look at the lid decal, it will say in small letters under the wreath, C. If not, it is a late Model 35. They are the same machine, but with a different designation. The Model 35 started out as the Jewel around 1913-14. The model 35 from about 1914-18. The C 1918-1925?. They are very common in Mahogany, but scarce in Oak. It looks like you are off to a good start with your restoration.
Harvey Kravitz
Re: Columbia Grafonola
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 1:12 pm
by Mr Grumpy
Thanks Harvey, just the info I was looking for.
@ilm75dodge,
My machine is also Oak and appears to have the original finish. I'm not %100 certain as my knowledge of Columbia's is limited but
I would say that it is not a gloss finish.
Re: Columbia Grafonola
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:32 pm
by ilm75dodge
Thanks for the info! From the original finish that is left I am trying to decide if it is was a semi gloss or satin but I leaning towards semi gloss based on the interior of the lid.
Re: Columbia Grafonola
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:59 pm
by Phonofreak
It was a semi-gloss finish on Oak. The Mahogany ones has a gloss finish.
Harvey Kravitz
Re: Columbia Grafonola
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:39 pm
by ilm75dodge
Does anyone know the correct way the wood grain should face on top of the lid? I have found pictures with it going both ways and I am a bit confused, I assume there was a specific way they did these from the factory!
Re: Columbia Grafonola
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:52 pm
by Mr Grumpy
The grain on mine runs from left to right (or right to left) not front to back.
The inside runs in the same direction.
Re: Columbia Grafonola
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:04 am
by De Soto Frank
As Phonofreak mentioned, this is the $35 Columbia machine, which started-out as the "Jewel". I have one in oak.
While that tone-arm is a later addition, it might be a better unit if you plan to play a lot of records on this machine.
Columbia machines are notorious for poor tracking characteristics / heavy record wear. This arm may improve that situation.
I will take pictures of the arm / reproducer on my machine tomorrow and post, for reference.
Good job on reconstructing this... they are neat machines !
