Should we reevaluate the run off line as a stylus test?
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 10:49 am
Hello All,
In my testing of the new Bruce Stylus a couple of times now I have experienced new looking run off areas where once the stylus is placed down on it lines appear. Not really dark lines but noticeable under a decent light. That happened yesterday again. Today I took the same record and placed another barely used Bruce Stylus down on it, same thing happened. Yet when I go a different record there is no obvious sign of the stylus from either head.
I know this has been mentioned before and several explanations have been given for why this happens. A coating added to some records was suggested several times. That may be the issue at hand. Still when discussing wether a stylus is still good often the run off test has been the gold standard for determining that. It may be that a better way is to test they stylus for any black material after the play though the grooves? Even that can be iffy as a record can produce some dust or dirt on the stylus when its been unplayed for a long time. Obviously a noticeable change in the look of the playing grooves would be something to look for. Even there sometimes the first few plays of a new record can slightly change appearance most likely due to the slight variations in shapes of stylus.
Any thoughts on what is the real test, short of having a high powered magnifying glass?
Happy Holidays
Larry
In my testing of the new Bruce Stylus a couple of times now I have experienced new looking run off areas where once the stylus is placed down on it lines appear. Not really dark lines but noticeable under a decent light. That happened yesterday again. Today I took the same record and placed another barely used Bruce Stylus down on it, same thing happened. Yet when I go a different record there is no obvious sign of the stylus from either head.
I know this has been mentioned before and several explanations have been given for why this happens. A coating added to some records was suggested several times. That may be the issue at hand. Still when discussing wether a stylus is still good often the run off test has been the gold standard for determining that. It may be that a better way is to test they stylus for any black material after the play though the grooves? Even that can be iffy as a record can produce some dust or dirt on the stylus when its been unplayed for a long time. Obviously a noticeable change in the look of the playing grooves would be something to look for. Even there sometimes the first few plays of a new record can slightly change appearance most likely due to the slight variations in shapes of stylus.
Any thoughts on what is the real test, short of having a high powered magnifying glass?
Happy Holidays
Larry