"RCA Victor" marked Orthophonic Sound box...
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 12:19 pm
I was very fortunate to obtain an RCA Victor Orthophonic Soundbox this week.
While it is a further evolution of the original Ortho reproducer (its original application was a portable), it has some interesting features:
> Round hole in the needle chuck ( no more fibre needles )
> no set-screws for the mounting bushing
> no phase plug - just the three-legged finger-guard cast into the throat of the back-plate.
> no "spider" on diaphragm: the "feet" are there, around the center "ridge", but the needle-bar is soldered to an eyelet in the center of the diaphragm itself. It would appear that a "spider" diaphragm simply had the spider clipped-off at the feet.
> Rubber cushions in the bearing pockets, don't know yet if there are washers within.
> brass /bronze screen over felt mute in outer cover.
I'm pretty confident no one has been into this box since it left Camden - there are no tool marks anywhere, or other signs of disturbance.
I am curious if anyone has done a comparison between "spider" and "non-spider" diaphragms, and noticed any significant differences in audio performance ?
While it is a further evolution of the original Ortho reproducer (its original application was a portable), it has some interesting features:
> Round hole in the needle chuck ( no more fibre needles )
> no set-screws for the mounting bushing
> no phase plug - just the three-legged finger-guard cast into the throat of the back-plate.
> no "spider" on diaphragm: the "feet" are there, around the center "ridge", but the needle-bar is soldered to an eyelet in the center of the diaphragm itself. It would appear that a "spider" diaphragm simply had the spider clipped-off at the feet.
> Rubber cushions in the bearing pockets, don't know yet if there are washers within.
> brass /bronze screen over felt mute in outer cover.
I'm pretty confident no one has been into this box since it left Camden - there are no tool marks anywhere, or other signs of disturbance.
I am curious if anyone has done a comparison between "spider" and "non-spider" diaphragms, and noticed any significant differences in audio performance ?