Page 1 of 1
I've heard of open-works, but open-spring?
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:44 pm
by phonophan79
Is that the spring all out in the open coiled like that?
http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/hnp/m ... 67009.html
Re: I've heard of open-works, but open-spring?
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:57 pm
by bbphonoguy
Given the cheapness of the construction, and even the diaphragm appears to be tin, my guess is that this was either a toy, or a premium given to kids who sold enough magazine subscriptions or something.
Re: I've heard of open-works, but open-spring?
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:58 pm
by phonogfp
That is indeed the mainspring, and several phonographs over the years employed a similar design without a barrel (the 1896-97 Type A Graphophone and all Edison Gems among them).
The machine pictured in the Craigslist post was offered by A.B. Cummings of Attleboro, Massachusetts in 1923 as the "Toy Model No. 101" to retail at $3.50. It winds with a key through the turntable. (I have an identical one here - - and owned it since 1969.) The same phonograph with a larger crank-wound motor was available as the "Toy Model No. 103" to retail at $5.50. The base stamping has several "extra" holes to accommodate either motor.
George P.
Re: I've heard of open-works, but open-spring?
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:17 pm
by JohnM
When springs aren't in barrels, the cranks or keys unwind as the mechanism runs.
Re: I've heard of open-works, but open-spring?
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:29 pm
by Shane
Yeah, that's one of the things that makes working on an Edison Gem easy, if you need to add some grease to the spring, or clean it up. No spring barrels to fool around with.