Page 1 of 2

Victrola No. 4 “A” Reproducer - Rebuild or Not

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 12:49 pm
by VictorVV-X
Hello all,

purchasing a HMV No. 4 soundbox recently, I was So impressed that I bought another and then bought an actual Victrola 4”A” with the original box. When I received it, I was surprised to find that it had a diaphragm made of partially aluminum and mostly from mica. I have heard of his variant, but wanted to know how common it was.
B664C86A-E3E7-4174-9E19-6970A7523F09.jpeg
0FB868A6-532C-4417-9A21-A8E7F3819B00.jpeg
It sounds amazing! But judging by the gaskets, it should be rebuilt. However, it is suffering from cracks in the pot metal, and I am wondering if it is better to just leave it alone? I would hate to have it fall apart!

Here is the advertisement from the company placed on/inside the box.
BE8F5F2C-C5CB-479C-9738-41486F22EFAC.jpeg
57842354-CC27-42F1-89D7-16E07281F22B.jpeg
8182C0C7-7EDC-45DB-AD7C-6AE6482381EA.jpeg

Re: Victrola No. 4 “A” Reproducer with ‘hybrid’ diaphragm

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 12:51 pm
by 52089
I've only ever had 3 or 4 Victor 4A reproducers, but they have all had the aluminum ring. I was not aware they existed any other way.

Re: Victrola No. 4 “A” Reproducer with ‘hybrid’ diaphragm

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 1:19 pm
by VictorVV-X
52089 wrote:I've only ever had 3 or 4 Victor 4A reproducers, but they have all had the aluminum ring. I was not aware they existed any other way.
Thank you for letting me know. I had always thought that the No. 4s used a purely mica diaphragm.

Re: Victrola No. 4 “A” Reproducer - Rebuild or Not

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 4:47 pm
by CarlosV
I also have a number of Victor 4 and 4As, and all have the silver ring. On the question of replacing gaskets, if it is sounding good, I would leave it alone. The pot metal of these nr 4As is quite unstable.

Re: Victrola No. 4 “A” Reproducer - Rebuild or Not

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 5:01 pm
by VictorVV-X
CarlosV wrote:I also have a number of Victor 4 and 4As, and all have the silver ring. On the question of replacing gaskets, if it is sounding good, I would leave it alone. The pot metal of these nr 4As is quite unstable.
CarlosV,

Thank you for your advice! I greatly appreciate it!

Re: Victrola No. 4 “A” Reproducer - Rebuild or Not

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 6:27 pm
by JerryVan
You haven't shown any photos of the back. If it looks as good as the front, I would say it could be carefully rebuilt without disaster.

Re: Victrola No. 4 “A” Reproducer - Rebuild or Not

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:42 pm
by Hit of the Week
I just got a VV 1-4 in the mail today that was a "Buy it Now" on Ebay last week. It has a 4a reproducer that I can't see an aluminum ring like what shows in your pictures.?
I don't like to buy machines from Ebay, but had never seen a VV 1-4 in the flesh. They had it listed as a VV-IV.......Baumbach doesn't list it in "Look for the Dog".

Iowa Dale

Re: Victrola No. 4 “A” Reproducer - Rebuild or Not

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 9:45 pm
by PeterF
If it sounds great, leave it be. It’s potmetal and it’s cracked.

If it ain’t broke, don’t break it.

Re: Victrola No. 4 “A” Reproducer - Rebuild or Not

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:45 pm
by BillH_NJ
I have replacement mica diaphragms to fit a 4, but all the original 4s I have include the metal ring. I haven’t tried replacing the diaphragm to see what difference it makes, but I assume there was a good reason for designing it with the ring and therefore have left well enough alone.

Re: Victrola No. 4 “A” Reproducer - Rebuild or Not

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2020 12:11 am
by mattrx
BillH_NJ wrote:I have replacement mica diaphragms to fit a 4, but all the original 4s I have include the metal ring. I haven’t tried replacing the diaphragm to see what difference it makes, but I assume there was a good reason for designing it with the ring and therefore have left well enough alone.
The one time I replaced the metal ring diaphragm on one of these with a full mica diaphragm, there was a rattle that I couldn't get rid of with the metal ring version. To each his own, but if there is a rattle, I'd carefully replace it on such a stable looking reproducer. I leave badly cracked ones alone.

One thread here on the forum discussed using the exhibition diaphragm gasket material instead of the black neoprene. I tried it and thought I achieved superior sound. I have both depending on what the desired look of the end result is, but sonically, I prefer the exhibition gasket tubing in this model reproducer.

My 2 cents. Good Luck!!

Matt