My mysterious little Columbia AA Graphophone
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 7:10 pm
I pulled this nice little machine out of an attic many years ago (the family said it had been up there for as long as anyone could remember) and have never gotten around to restoring it, though I still intend to, someday. I identified it pretty early on as a Columbia AA, and confirmed this when Hazelcorn's Columbia Phonograph Companion came out, but his entry for this machine raised a lot of questions about mine.
As you can see, mine has the "small" decal, and according to Hazelcorn, all of these left the factory with the "large" decal. He does say in a footnote that he knows of one example with the small decal and the 1906 Milan Exposition decal on the back, then adds in a second footnote that he knows of one other small decal version with a 1904 St. Louis Exposition decal on the back. Well, as you can see, mine also has the 1904 decal, so I guess that makes two of them, now? Of course, it's been almost 25 years since that book was published, and I'm hoping more information about these has come to light since then. Does anyone know of more examples, either 1904 or 1906? Hazelcorn speculated that perhaps someone sent in a damaged original AA cabinet to the factory and they sent back a leftover case with new decals on it, but that seems a stretch to me, especially now that we know it's not exactly a one-off. If anyone out there knows more about this matter, I would be very interested to hear.
As picture #8 shows, my machine has the end-cap on the mandrel, which I believe was introduced after 1901, when the AA was sold. So again, this points to it being a later-produced machine. Also, Hazelcorn lists the last serial number for the AA as 712527, but as picture #9 shows, mine has the serial number 712826 -- much later than Hazelcorn's latest known example.
Another mystery is the reproducer. Hazelcorn says this machine originally came with a Columbia #2 floating reproducer, which makes sense given the 1901 date. Mine, though, has -- well, you can see what it is. Nothing like it is pictured in Hazelcorn. It looks like some 1980's reproductions I have seen (although none of those had stylus bars like this one does), but given that I know this was sitting in that attic at least since the 1960's, and probably earlier, I don't know how that's possible. What's more, just about every picture of an AA I've seen online has this same reproducer on it, except for one that appears to have a Columbia #7 on it. Could it be original? If so, what is it?
Finally, a few more questions:
1. What would the crank look like? If anyone has one, I'd be grateful if you'd post some pictures. Having seen the shaft, I'd guess it has to be slotted. How hard are they to find? I hope they're not unique to this machine.
2. Should there be an escutcheon around the crank hole? If so, can anyone post a picture?
3. Two of the corners are missing the carved pillars. Before I go trying to make replacements myself, is there someone out there who makes these, or has in the past? I know it's a longshot, but...
4. I can't get the reproducer off. (I don't want to try too hard and risk damaging it.) Any tips?
Oh, and if you would like to see pictures of the motor, let me know. There are strings around the governor weights, so someone did at least that much. (I've found several Columbia cylinder machines with those; I guess the spring bars didn't age well.)
Thanks, everyone!
As you can see, mine has the "small" decal, and according to Hazelcorn, all of these left the factory with the "large" decal. He does say in a footnote that he knows of one example with the small decal and the 1906 Milan Exposition decal on the back, then adds in a second footnote that he knows of one other small decal version with a 1904 St. Louis Exposition decal on the back. Well, as you can see, mine also has the 1904 decal, so I guess that makes two of them, now? Of course, it's been almost 25 years since that book was published, and I'm hoping more information about these has come to light since then. Does anyone know of more examples, either 1904 or 1906? Hazelcorn speculated that perhaps someone sent in a damaged original AA cabinet to the factory and they sent back a leftover case with new decals on it, but that seems a stretch to me, especially now that we know it's not exactly a one-off. If anyone out there knows more about this matter, I would be very interested to hear.
As picture #8 shows, my machine has the end-cap on the mandrel, which I believe was introduced after 1901, when the AA was sold. So again, this points to it being a later-produced machine. Also, Hazelcorn lists the last serial number for the AA as 712527, but as picture #9 shows, mine has the serial number 712826 -- much later than Hazelcorn's latest known example.
Another mystery is the reproducer. Hazelcorn says this machine originally came with a Columbia #2 floating reproducer, which makes sense given the 1901 date. Mine, though, has -- well, you can see what it is. Nothing like it is pictured in Hazelcorn. It looks like some 1980's reproductions I have seen (although none of those had stylus bars like this one does), but given that I know this was sitting in that attic at least since the 1960's, and probably earlier, I don't know how that's possible. What's more, just about every picture of an AA I've seen online has this same reproducer on it, except for one that appears to have a Columbia #7 on it. Could it be original? If so, what is it?
Finally, a few more questions:
1. What would the crank look like? If anyone has one, I'd be grateful if you'd post some pictures. Having seen the shaft, I'd guess it has to be slotted. How hard are they to find? I hope they're not unique to this machine.
2. Should there be an escutcheon around the crank hole? If so, can anyone post a picture?
3. Two of the corners are missing the carved pillars. Before I go trying to make replacements myself, is there someone out there who makes these, or has in the past? I know it's a longshot, but...
4. I can't get the reproducer off. (I don't want to try too hard and risk damaging it.) Any tips?
Oh, and if you would like to see pictures of the motor, let me know. There are strings around the governor weights, so someone did at least that much. (I've found several Columbia cylinder machines with those; I guess the spring bars didn't age well.)
Thanks, everyone!