Berliner "sound quality" 1894-1900
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 10:27 am
Before replying "well, what do you expect for something recorded that far back?" which is certainly fair, my inquiry is if indeed there was any substantial "improvement" in sound quality to Berliners during the almost six years that they were recorded and pressed; especially those towards the end of the run in 1899-1900.
Weren't there numbers etched on many of the labels that signified horn length or distance or some such thing? Did those result in any change as to what one hears?
"Improvements" are noticeable in other labels after about 1902-04, even if some would say that some Victors became less spontaneous and more bland, shall we say, after the move to Camden; and then some Columbias are rather soft and distant as contrasted to earlier recordings. These are broad statements, of course; not the point of the thread.
I don't own many Berliners, but have listened to nigh onto 150 or so. Obviously, there are many more "out there," and doubtless some of you have quite a few.
Thanks in advance.
Weren't there numbers etched on many of the labels that signified horn length or distance or some such thing? Did those result in any change as to what one hears?
"Improvements" are noticeable in other labels after about 1902-04, even if some would say that some Victors became less spontaneous and more bland, shall we say, after the move to Camden; and then some Columbias are rather soft and distant as contrasted to earlier recordings. These are broad statements, of course; not the point of the thread.
I don't own many Berliners, but have listened to nigh onto 150 or so. Obviously, there are many more "out there," and doubtless some of you have quite a few.
Thanks in advance.