Stanton Auction April
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 9:45 pm
Get the latest auction catalog for this auction. Auctions by Stanton's have always been interesting and even though a bit of a "hike" from Seattle I have attended several and found success. Lots of wonderful and interesting items have made their way to the block over the past few auctions but one this month features a very interesting lot. Focus on the Phonautograph listing. Story, the machine was in the collection of Dr. Drake of Martinsville Indiana as I remember. His sale of the collection transfered title to a European buyer (as reported) who elected to price items in the collection before shipment to Europe and if they sold at that price then fine the buyer got the item. If no sale at the placed price then the item was shipped to Europe. The Phonautogaph was reportly sold for $17,000 to the current owner.
Fast forward to today. Is it the real deal or a reproduction (maybe a very old reproduction) or a variation of the real deal and of the time period of 1857-1870?? Apparently the lines are drawn and the experts have rendered numerous opinions. Stanton had been cautioned about the use of all original and will report that the item is as is where is and for bidders they need to do their homework which, in my opinion, is the correct answer. Since none of these machines have appeared in the auction circut in recent history (of many years) then what to do. Several experts agree the outside of the "recording horn" appears to be restored but the plaster inside of the horn looks very original and very old. Correct patina on the metal parts further creates the mystery.
Is the "dance" of not original not historic("not not this but that") really what is being done to scare folks away so the major players can buy for bargain or is it possibly a later original but a partially restored "real deal"??? After reading Wyatt's recent find wonderful article in this website re the Class M, I pause on this one. Take a chance?? We will know soon.
LH
Af
Fast forward to today. Is it the real deal or a reproduction (maybe a very old reproduction) or a variation of the real deal and of the time period of 1857-1870?? Apparently the lines are drawn and the experts have rendered numerous opinions. Stanton had been cautioned about the use of all original and will report that the item is as is where is and for bidders they need to do their homework which, in my opinion, is the correct answer. Since none of these machines have appeared in the auction circut in recent history (of many years) then what to do. Several experts agree the outside of the "recording horn" appears to be restored but the plaster inside of the horn looks very original and very old. Correct patina on the metal parts further creates the mystery.
Is the "dance" of not original not historic("not not this but that") really what is being done to scare folks away so the major players can buy for bargain or is it possibly a later original but a partially restored "real deal"??? After reading Wyatt's recent find wonderful article in this website re the Class M, I pause on this one. Take a chance?? We will know soon.
LH
Af