Page 1 of 2
Question about the term "Oxford."
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:14 am
by Jerry B.
The thread about the unmarked Columbia BV client machine raised a question. Did Sears call most any machine, either disc or cylinder, an Oxford or Oxford Junior? Was that just a Sears label? What did other large mail order companies call their machines?
Thanks, Jerry B.
Re: Question about the term "Oxford."
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:38 am
by JerryVan
Yes, that was Sears' brand name. Possibly Harvard as well. (Makes sense, given the college theme.) I believe Montgomery Ward used the name Thornward. Others can/will confirm.
Re: Question about the term "Oxford."
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2025 1:55 am
by gramophone-georg
AFAIK Montgomery Ward machines and records were Lakeside (early), then Cecilian, then Airline.
Re: Question about the term "Oxford."
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:25 am
by JerryVan
gramophone-georg wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 1:55 am
AFAIK Montgomery Ward machines and records were Lakeside (early), then Cecilian, then Airline.
Thanks Georg. I was hoping someone would double check my "Thornward" statement.
Re: Question about the term "Oxford."
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:06 am
by OrthoFan
JerryVan wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:25 am
gramophone-georg wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 1:55 am
AFAIK Montgomery Ward machines and records were Lakeside (early), then Cecilian, then Airline.
Thanks Georg. I was hoping someone would double check my "Thornward" statement.
Apparently, for a short time --
https://www.intertique.com/ThornwardID.html
Also, the brand was not limited to phonographs --
https://collectiblend.com/Cameras/Montg ... Dandy.html
Re: Question about the term "Oxford."
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:55 am
by JerryVan

Perhaps I've been redeemed?!
Re: Question about the term "Oxford."
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:14 pm
by gramophone-georg
JerryVan wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:55 am

Perhaps I've been redeemed?!
I intended to research this today. I was employed by MW in the 70s and am sort of an historian on it a little but had never heard of the Thornward brand. But the name combo seemed plausible and it ain't like JerryVan to say something out of left field.

Re: Question about the term "Oxford."
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:27 pm
by JerryVan
gramophone-georg wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:14 pm
JerryVan wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:55 am

Perhaps I've been redeemed?!
I intended to research this today. I was employed by MW in the 70s and am sort of an historian on it a little but had never heard of the Thornward brand. But the name combo seemed plausible and it ain't like JerryVan to say something out of left field.

Re: Question about the term "Oxford."
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:17 pm
by phonojim
Jerry, you are correct. Columbia did build a Thornward cylinder machine for Montgomery Ward ca. 1901 as shown in Howard Hazelcorn's Columbia Phonograph Companion vol. 1 which also includes a note on the origin of the name. As far as I know, that was the only use of the name.
Re: Question about the term "Oxford."
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2025 5:46 pm
by phonogfp
Here's the earlier Thornward decal as it appeared in
The Talking Machine Compendium (1997). The authors got the 1897 date wrong.

- From "The Talking Machine Compendium" by Fabrizio & Paul. All Rights Reserved.
Here's the later decal as shown in
Discovering Antique Phonographs (2000). The date was almost right.

- From "Discovering Antique Phonographs" by Fabrizio &n Paul. All Rights Reserved.
Finally, in the March 2008 issue of the APS magazine, an article appeared which examined Montgomery-Ward's earliest talking machine offerings, and correctly established the date of the Thornward's introduction as Spring/Summer 1901. Sometimes research takes years.
George P.