Page 1 of 1

Zonophone question

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:02 pm
by dennis
Does anyone know which styling on a Zonophone of circa 1898 to 1903 is 1) older and 2) more rare - the crank-thru-the-wooden-case or the crank-thru-the-metal-hump?

Thanks.

Re: Zonophone question

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:46 pm
by Jerry B.
Thanks to Gregg Kline and George Paul's excellent article, the early Zonophone cranks went through the side of the cabinets and the ones with the cranks entering the hump were later. The new publication in available on line and well worth the effort to locate and read. Better yet, join the club!

Re: Zonophone question

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:02 am
by Jerry B.
I should have mentioned the publication is "The Antique Phonograph" (formerly "The Sound Box") published by The Antique Phonograph Society (formerly the California Antique Phonograph Society). It's a great organization and dues are only $25 which includes the world class publication mailed quarterly. If you (anyone) really really can't afford the $25, I'll kick in $10 towards your first year dues. Jerry Blais

Re: Zonophone question

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:14 am
by dennis
Thanks, Jerry, for your response. I can afford the $25. However, if you would like to help me with the Orthophonic Credenza I've been lusting for............... :D

Re: Zonophone question

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 2:57 pm
by phonogfp
Thanks, Jerry, for your kind words about the article. For anyone wanting to see it, along with the entire December 2011 issue of The Antique Phonograph, here's a link:

http://www.antiquephono.org/aps_008.htm

George P.

Re: Zonophone question

Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:02 pm
by Jerry B.
Were all the rear mount Zonophone machines introduced after Victor took control of the Zonophone company?

Re: Zonophone question

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:38 pm
by phonogfp
Jerry B. wrote:Were all the ream mount Zonophone machines introduced after Victor took control of the Zonophone company?
Yes. I doubt any rear mount Zonophones were manufactured before 1904.

George P.