How common are 1930s separate component turntables?

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8164
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: How common are 1930s separate component turntables?

Post by phonogfp »

I was going to dig out a Polk Radiotrola and take a photo, when I remembered that we included it in Discovering Antique Phonographs. Here it is (click on the photo twice to enlarge):
From "Discovering Antique Phonographs" by Fabrizio & Paul.  All Rights Reserved.
From "Discovering Antique Phonographs" by Fabrizio & Paul. All Rights Reserved.
It sounds quite good! :)

Unfortunately, I almost never use it, nor even see it since it's in a closet... :(

George P.

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: How common are 1930s separate component turntables?

Post by gramophone78 »

Here is a model RCA offered to connect to their radio's.
1938 RCA 88-K Radio With RCA R-93 Phonograph (4).JPG
RCA Model 88 Radio with R-93 Phonograph (3).JPG

Lenoirstreetguy
Victor IV
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:43 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Re: How common are 1930s separate component turntables?

Post by Lenoirstreetguy »

Got digging in my Lafayette Radio catalogues and here's a little gem from 1933. It was offered in several configurations and this was the cheapest. The description on page 50 makes it very clear that all you're buying at that price was a turntable and pickup...with no amplifier. If you wanted it with 33 ⅓ capabilities it cost $19.50. I'd have bought one of these.

Jim
Attachments
IMG.jpg

Kirkwood
Victor II
Posts: 391
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:17 pm

Re: How common are 1930s separate component turntables?

Post by Kirkwood »

Here's the GE-badged version of the RCA end table unit shown in the advert. This was on eBay some months back, this pic is one I saved from that listing. This GE table, by the way, featured a top that slid back, rather than lifting up----no need to remove magazines, ash trays or sleeping cats to play a record.
Attachments
GE.Electrola.Endtable.02.JPG
GE.Electrola.Endtable.02.JPG (28.68 KiB) Viewed 685 times

Edisone
Victor IV
Posts: 1140
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Can see Canada from Attic Window

Re: How common are 1930s separate component turntables?

Post by Edisone »

I think I have the first RCA cheapo turntable, which I got for 5cents over the original selling price ( $10 vs $9.95) ... it has a magnetic pick-up, synchronous motor which must be hand-started, and an unattached wooden cover. I've only ever used it with headphones, and it generates enough power to sound halfway decent with those.

Lenoirstreetguy
Victor IV
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:43 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Re: How common are 1930s separate component turntables?

Post by Lenoirstreetguy »

Here's a 1936 ad for Victor " Higher Fidelity Recording" and the small " record player." 1936 was when record sales really began to turn around after the nadir of 1932-33. And actually " higher fidelity" wasn't just ad hype: some of these 'thirties recordings are really fine. Some swing sides are amazing...IF you can find them from a non dubbed master. This was the trick up here: why wire Camden for a fresh master when we can just dub one from a worn pressing....or whatever they did. :D

Jim
Attachments
IMG_0002.jpg

Post Reply