℞: One Phonograph...

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
User avatar
De Soto Frank
Victor V
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:27 pm
Location: Northeast Pennsylvania

Re: ℞: One Phonograph...

Post by De Soto Frank »

I wonder if they had an interruption in their supply of copper diaphragms, and the mica was a temporary get-by ? :coffee:
De Soto Frank

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8165
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: ℞: One Phonograph...

Post by phonogfp »

Due to the results of long-standing litigation against Edison by the New York Phonograph Company, Edison was prohibited from (among other things) using mica in reproducers in 1906. This at first would have applied only to those components sold in New York State, but eventually all Edison reproducers were using copper diaphragms until the introduction of the Disc reproducers. :)

George P.

User avatar
Lucius1958
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4103
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
Personal Text: 'Don't take Life so serious, son. It ain't nohow permanent.' - 'POGO'
Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...

Re: ℞: One Phonograph...

Post by Lucius1958 »

After thorough cleaning and lubrication, plus a new belt, the Standard runs fine, playing at least 3 cylinders on one winding. There's a little chatter from the upper gears, but that's to be expected.

The reproducer plays loud, if rather noisy on loud passages: we'll see what new gaskets will do.

Bill

User avatar
Lucius1958
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4103
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
Personal Text: 'Don't take Life so serious, son. It ain't nohow permanent.' - 'POGO'
Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...

Re: ℞: One Phonograph...

Post by Lucius1958 »

And here it is, with a little selection appropriate for today:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2h7lv ... stra_music

Bill

Post Reply