Reproducer dates and historical accuracy?!

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Post Reply
PinnacleReproducer
Victor O
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:13 am

Reproducer dates and historical accuracy?!

Post by PinnacleReproducer »

Hello! Can anyone explain or point me to where I can read about how many Victrola reproducers there were, when they came out, and what machines they are correct for? For example - my VV IX from 1915 has an Exhibition, but would a 1917 IX be correct with a No 2 OR an Exhibition?! Is there a complete list of reproducers (Victrola only)? My Google skills have failed...

Thanks!!!

User avatar
Roaring20s
Victor V
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:55 am
Personal Text: Those who were seen dancing were thought insane by those who could not hear the music. Nietzsche
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: Reproducer dates and historical accuracy?!

Post by Roaring20s »

This should help...
http://www.gracyk.com/reproducer.shtml

James.

User avatar
Lucius1958
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4103
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
Personal Text: 'Don't take Life so serious, son. It ain't nohow permanent.' - 'POGO'
Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...

Re: Reproducer dates and historical accuracy?!

Post by Lucius1958 »

It depends on what you mean by "historically accurate".

The original owner of a Victrola might have chosen to upgrade it when the newer reproducer became available: that certainly reflects the instrument's history.

Bill

PinnacleReproducer
Victor O
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:13 am

Re: Reproducer dates and historical accuracy?!

Post by PinnacleReproducer »

Excellent - thank you for the replies!

User avatar
AZ*
Victor IV
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:51 pm
Location: USA

Re: Reproducer dates and historical accuracy?!

Post by AZ* »

You could buy the excellent books, "Look for the Dog" and the "Victor Data Book" if you want to learn more.
Best regards ... AZ*

Phototone
Victor III
Posts: 548
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:56 pm

Re: Reproducer dates and historical accuracy?!

Post by Phototone »

If the ORIGINAL OWNER of a machine updated the reproducer, once or several times during his ownership to keep the machine current, wouldn't they all be "historically" accurate? I'm sure lots of folks that kept their "teens" era machines may have upgraded to an aftermarket "orthophonic style" reproducer to play electric records. After all, many, many folks modified their Edison cylinder machines as newer harder wax, longer play and celluloid cylinders became available.

Perhaps a more accurate way to phrase the question would be "What reproducer did Victor (for example) ship from the factory with a certain machine during a specific year?"

User avatar
Retrograde
Victor III
Posts: 959
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:47 pm

Re: Reproducer dates and historical accuracy?!

Post by Retrograde »

I understand the OPs question, and the answer is not so clear as others have noted. The most vague Victor reproducer originality comes with the Exhibition and the Victrola No 2 because those were available at the same time.

I'll add, that once these machines hit the secondary market, all bets are off as far as originality. Some dealers are the worst offenders of screwing up originality by swapping out reproducers or other parts to make a machine whole. Same goes for horns. This is why you'll see a super nice machine with a nasty reproducer and/or a beat-to-crap horn.

And I'll agree with AZ*, those books have information regarding what reproducers came on which victor machines. The books are well worth their small cost.

Post Reply