I think WW2. It looks like something made in the 1930s. The reproducer appears to have a metal diaphragm, something that did not exist until the Orthophonic era.briankeith wrote:So what was the war it was used - WW1 or WW2 ? If you look closely at the inspectors card on the web page photograph I posted, the card looks like it is dated 1915....
Looky what I found today locally !!
- VintageTechnologies
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:09 pm
Re: Looky what I found today locally !!
-
estott
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4176
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:23 pm
- Personal Text: I have good days...this might not be one of them
- Location: Albany NY
Re: Looky what I found today locally !!
Something odd there because this is NOT from anywhere near 1915.briankeith wrote:I understand there were a lot more of the Army models made then the Navy models - I wonder why? Just curiousSo what was the war it was used - WW1 or WW2 ? If you look closely at the inspectors card on the web page photograph I posted, the card looks like it is dated 1915....
- briankeith
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:27 am
- Personal Text: Jeepster
- Location: Blairstown, New Jersey 07825
Re: Looky what I found today locally !!
Mine has no date card - that photo I posted was from a website showing the same phonograph with a date card, same model USN field phonograph - I think it is early WW2 - but even in the early 1940's they were still using spring driven phonographs? Possibly as it states "field phonograph" and there are no electrical plug out in the fields of battle. 
-
Edisone
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:17 pm
- Location: Can see Canada from Attic Window
Re: Looky what I found today locally !!
That 'postcard' looks like fantasy:
1. Where were the Marines posted 'over seas' in 1915?
2. ALL phonos were "mechanical" in 1915, so there wouldn't have been need for designating any as such.
3. There weren't any official issue phonos at all in 1915, which is why the Government had to request bids for such things when we got into WWI .
ps - Mechanical portables were made to play both 78 and 33 ⅓ "V-Discs" , which were meant for only temporary entertainment and not long-term survival.
1. Where were the Marines posted 'over seas' in 1915?
2. ALL phonos were "mechanical" in 1915, so there wouldn't have been need for designating any as such.
3. There weren't any official issue phonos at all in 1915, which is why the Government had to request bids for such things when we got into WWI .
ps - Mechanical portables were made to play both 78 and 33 ⅓ "V-Discs" , which were meant for only temporary entertainment and not long-term survival.
- Lucius1958
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4103
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
- Personal Text: 'Don't take Life so serious, son. It ain't nohow permanent.' - 'POGO'
- Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...
Re: Looky what I found today locally !!
In fact, to my eye, it looks more like 1975.... which is just as odd...estott wrote:Something odd there because this is NOT from anywhere near 1915.briankeith wrote:I understand there were a lot more of the Army models made then the Navy models - I wonder why? Just curiousSo what was the war it was used - WW1 or WW2 ? If you look closely at the inspectors card on the web page photograph I posted, the card looks like it is dated 1915....
Bill