Info Needed on Pink Lambert

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
Post Reply
User avatar
Talkophone
Victor II
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:03 am

Info Needed on Pink Lambert

Post by Talkophone »

Picked one up today thinking it was Pink Lambert but it is announced Edison-Bell Indestructible record. What is the difference?

Larry

User avatar
rgordon939
Victor V
Posts: 2655
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 2:41 pm
Location: Linden, NJ 07036
Contact:

Re: Info Needed on Pink Lambert

Post by rgordon939 »

The most important Edison vs. Lambert litigation was because of the cylinder's compatibility to the mandrels of Edison phonographs. Edison claimed that Lambert was infringing his patents because of that format use. The court did not follow his point of view as Lambert cylinders did have an inner conical form but were totally straight and only touched the phonograph mandrel with each edge.

Patent showdowns were not a real problem in Europe were Lambert started a joint venture with the British Edison-Bell Company to have his indestructible cylinders sold as "Edison-Bell Indestructible Records", followed also by a continental sales subsidiary in Hamburg, Germany.

However, the expensive legal conflicts had taken Lambert's Company bankrupt. Edison may not have legally won this fight but certainly won it economically. In 1912 Edison was finally allowed to use celluloid for the production of his own cylinders and immediately released his brand-new Amberola cylinder.

Rich Gordon

User avatar
Talkophone
Victor II
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:03 am

Re: Info Needed on Pink Lambert

Post by Talkophone »

Rich,

Thank You for that info on the cylinder.

Larry

Post Reply