Shellac Record Press - Anyone Ever Seen One?

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
User avatar
Odeon
Victor I
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:38 am
Personal Text: Stomp off, let´s go !
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Shellac Record Press - Anyone Ever Seen One?

Post by Odeon »

Interesting! That´s a comparatively small machine. Thanks about this pic!

User avatar
edisonphonoworks
Victor IV
Posts: 1566
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:50 am
Personal Text: A new blank with authentic formula and spiral core!
Contact:

Re: Shellac Record Press - Anyone Ever Seen One?

Post by edisonphonoworks »

The smaller metal part is a stamper probably from the 40s I have, it is nickel faced and copper backed and .046" thick 1502-A is the matrix number, it is a language I am not sure of, sound Russian maybe. The other is a modern metal master (not stamper) for a 12" 45 dance club record, and it is .034" thick in contrast, but is silver faces, nickel backed.
Attachments
back side of a modern metal master
back side of a modern metal master
Modern master metal part, (not stamper, masters have rough edges and are silver and nickle.
Modern master metal part, (not stamper, masters have rough edges and are silver and nickle.
Back of 78rpm stamper
Back of 78rpm stamper
78rpm stamper from the 1940's
78rpm stamper from the 1940's

User avatar
edisonphonoworks
Victor IV
Posts: 1566
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:50 am
Personal Text: A new blank with authentic formula and spiral core!
Contact:

Re: Shellac Record Press - Anyone Ever Seen One?

Post by edisonphonoworks »

bump

User avatar
Odeon
Victor I
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:38 am
Personal Text: Stomp off, let´s go !
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Shellac Record Press - Anyone Ever Seen One?

Post by Odeon »

pr.jpg

User avatar
edisonphonoworks
Victor IV
Posts: 1566
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:50 am
Personal Text: A new blank with authentic formula and spiral core!
Contact:

Re: Shellac Record Press - Anyone Ever Seen One?

Post by edisonphonoworks »

It looks like, while pressure certainly is important the steam temperature, and pressure are paramount. The 78 biscuit or puck is usually square,as they were rolled out of the mixing mill and into other rollers.

User avatar
De Soto Frank
Victor V
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:27 pm
Location: Northeast Pennsylvania

Re: Shellac Record Press - Anyone Ever Seen One?

Post by De Soto Frank »

Odeon wrote:
pr.jpg

The press seems to be made by a Francis Shaw & Co., I can't quite make-out the location, but think it might be "Manchester" ?

At any rate, the press seems as though it might be English.


Thanks for sharing this photo. :)
De Soto Frank

User avatar
Odeon
Victor I
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:38 am
Personal Text: Stomp off, let´s go !
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Shellac Record Press - Anyone Ever Seen One?

Post by Odeon »

Good eyes :D
pr2.jpg
pr2.jpg (28.33 KiB) Viewed 1558 times

User avatar
De Soto Frank
Victor V
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:27 pm
Location: Northeast Pennsylvania

Re: Shellac Record Press - Anyone Ever Seen One?

Post by De Soto Frank »

edisonphonoworks wrote:It looks like, while pressure certainly is important the steam temperature, and pressure are paramount. The 78 biscuit or puck is usually square,as they were rolled out of the mixing mill and into other rollers.

Back in the days before WW II, most maunfacturing plants used steam for a variety of applications because it was readily available: mechanized operations were run by line-shafts and belts, driven by a stationary steam engine(s), the plant was heated by steam radiators (if at all), so there were already boilers and piping available.

Steam would have been convenient and comparatively cheap as a motive power / heating / "hydraulic" source.


If we were trying to set-up a press today, particularly a small operation, the heating would probably be achieved through electric heating elements ( at least for things like the biscuit tables ), and the pressing pressure via hyrdaulic pumps run by electric motor. If the record press is of a nature where it needs to be heated quickly, then perhaps a burst or "flash" of steam would still work best, although if any part of the steam system were allowed to cool below 212* F. the steam would condense in the system, and form pools or "slugs" of water, which could interfere with heat-transfer on the next heating cycle.

My bet would be that when they were doing a run of pressings, they would get the presses hot, blowing-out any condensation, then keep them hot until the run was finished.

While steam can nominally be thought of as having a temperature of 212* F, depending on the pressure on the system, the temperature can actually be above or below the boiling point of water in an open vessel.

For each pound of pressure increase above atmosphere at sea level (14 psi), the boiling point is raised approx 2* F.... so, for instance, our household pressure cooker at 15 psi, will reach an internal temperature of approximately 242* F.

In a high-pressure system, such as a steam locomotive, operating at boiler pressures in excess of 100 psi, the temperature rises accordingly.


I would think there was a sweet temperature for the shellac compound where it was plastic enough to take the impression from the stomper, yet still hold its shape when the press was opened.

Does anyone know if the stompers were treated with any sort of "releasing agent" ? ( I've certainly destroyed enough waffles trying to pry them out of the plates of the iron when they stick... )

:coffee:
De Soto Frank

User avatar
Odeon
Victor I
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:38 am
Personal Text: Stomp off, let´s go !
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Shellac Record Press - Anyone Ever Seen One?

Post by Odeon »

Does anyone know if the stompers were treated with any sort of "releasing agent" ?
According to some old German articles, the (hot) stamper had been wiped of with a cloth soaked in oil.

A Ford 1
Victor II
Posts: 414
Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 1:55 pm

Re: Shellac Record Press - Anyone Ever Seen One?

Post by A Ford 1 »

I would think that the steam in the record press would be at a lower pressure than the boiler and, therefore, would be throttled to that lower pressure to form dry super heated steam. It would be easy to, there by, adjust the process temperature to a relatively constant value, that constant temperature could be adjustable based on the extent of throttling, and by bleeding super-heated steam through the press condensate (water) could be eliminated. The other reason for doing this is that wet steam at high speeds can erode the components it is in contact with. The greater the degree of throttling (lower process pressure) the higher the temperature of the super heated steam. Throttling is the expansion of steam with out doing work i.e. a constant enthalpy process.
I think we need some one like Jay Leno with not only the steam generating equipment but the deep pockets to pull off a project like this.
Best regards,
Allen

Post Reply