Hi Marco,Marco Gilardetti wrote:Please don't think that I was judging what you were doing. We're not working for a museum after all, and however most of the gramophone-realated things that I see in museums are very questionably handled (or non-handled, which is worse) IMHO. We all do what we think is best for our machines and for the future of our machines, with our money, and the rest of the world should anyhow praise what we do, as "official" or "state" museums do little to nothing in comparison to preserve the phonograph/gramophone heritage. At least here.martinola wrote:It was a difficult decision and I wouldn't fault anyone for having a different idea of what should have been done.
I was just struck by the fact that everything seemed to go ahead very well looking at the pictures, and then all of a sudden - BANG! - there's a naked case that looks as if it just came out of the carpentry!
I, too, also like early Home models very much and I'm looking for a decent and usable unit since at least a decade.
I don't think anyone took your quote out of context? I knew what you meant and took no objections to your post. You are exactly right. In fact, when I bought the machine, I thought it was a 2nd style red case Home. The guys on the forum noticed the case and informed me it wasn't, but it still had the bed plate I wanted, so off to Martin for a re-do. The banner decal had turned completely red, and could not be saved. That's the reason for the re-finish.