Victrola VV-X Photos Requested

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
VV-Montreal
Victor Jr
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 5:31 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec

Victrola VV-X Photos Requested

Post by VV-Montreal »

Would anyone have photos of the insides of a correct Victrola VV-X tabletop 1910 model?
The one I recently acquired has perhaps been tinkered with.
A notch in the horn makes room for the speed control arm, but its contours are rough and unprofessional, and the cut seems recent. Perhaps the motor is not original to the machine.
Thanks for your help.
Attachments
VV-X under lid.jpg
VV-X Insides.jpg
Last edited by VV-Montreal on Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
TonyJ
Victor I
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Victrola VV-X Photos Requested

Post by TonyJ »

I found this by doing a quick search : http://www.yesterdayrevisited.com/yrsto ... d=86KHWcmS

While I haven't seen a whole lot of machines personally, I'm thinking the speed control is generally in the front. Maybe as you mentioned, it's not original

VV-Montreal
Victor Jr
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 5:31 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec

Re: Victrola VV-X Photos Requested

Post by VV-Montreal »

Thank you, Tony. I should have specified that mine is a tabletop early 1910 model with the bullet brake.
I have modified the initial post.

Jerry B.
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8743
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:25 am
Personal Text: Stop for a visit when in Oregon.
Location: Albany, Oregon

Re: Victrola VV-X Photos Requested

Post by Jerry B. »

I think your machine is 100% correct except for the placement of the brake and your non-Victor key. This is what I believe:

I think the first Victrola, or VTLA (abbreviation for "Victrola") was a sales surprise even to the Victor Company. The name "VTLA" doesn't even suggest the possibility of additional Victrola models. The VTLA became the VV-XVI and sales soared. The first table model Victrola was the XII. Victor replaced their most expensive horn models with even more expensive internal horn Victrolas and sales soared. What were customers buying? Customers were buying the look and status of the product at the sacrifice of performance. The modestly priced Victor III offered a powerful double spring motor and a large horn but it did not offer the status and look of a Victrola.

Your Victrola X was intended to be a low priced Victrola. I suspect Victor had an abundance of double spring Victor III motors and there was pressure to use up surplus motors. A properly build Victrola would separate the spring motor from the horn. To use the older motor, Victor would have to build taller cabinets but this would alter the look of the Victrola. We've already determined that appearance was more important than performance to Victor so their response followed that logic. The top of the horn was eliminated and the somewhat noisy spring motor was suspended in the horn and everything looked great on the outside.

Every table model VV-X that I've seen is exactly like yours. The motor sits in the horn and the cut in the horn for the crank is sloppy and unprofessional in appearance. Your Victrola X is, in my opinion, a historic and valuable example. It is very early and a visual example of Victor's corporate values.

You have a great Victrola.

Jerry Blais

VV-Montreal
Victor Jr
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 5:31 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec

Re: Victrola VV-X Photos Requested

Post by VV-Montreal »

Thanks so much, Jerry.
You're right that the brake was moved for some reason. There are holes where it used to be.
Still, it looks great, the cabinet being in excellent shape. But the motor is rather noisy compared to my VV-VIII, which is to be expected given that it sits in the middle of the horn.
Too bad the machine lost its nameplate at some point.

brianu
Victor V
Posts: 2165
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:35 pm
Personal Text: on instagram as "oncedeadsound"
Location: just outside Philadelphia, PA

Re: Victrola VV-X Photos Requested

Post by brianu »

VV-Montreal wrote:Too bad the machine lost its nameplate at some point.
probably when it was refinished. you may find one on ebay for a X, but the correct style for this early tabletop version would be a challenge.

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Victrola VV-X Photos Requested

Post by gramophone78 »

Isn't the needle cups section missing also...??. Oh wait, I see it hiding for on the other side. The reproducer blocked it.. :oops:. Did the early X's have their cups mounted in different places..?.

VV-Montreal
Victor Jr
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 5:31 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec

Re: Victrola VV-X Photos Requested

Post by VV-Montreal »

Here's a better picture. I've just seen another post and now realize that the brake, needle cups and lid support have all been moved (by a left-hander?).
Attachments
20160414_142053.jpg

bobbypsarudakis
Victor Jr
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:02 am

Re: Victrola VV-X Photos Requested

Post by bobbypsarudakis »

This particular model looks to be a table top similar to the the VV-XI and probably shares the same parts with the "Low Boy" model. Pictures of the "Low Boy" attached.

Just my thoughts
Attachments
low.jpg
low.jpg (190.21 KiB) Viewed 1086 times

User avatar
Ripduf1
Victor III
Posts: 924
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 1:41 pm
Personal Text: HORNS ROLLED & STRAIGHTENED
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: Victrola VV-X Photos Requested

Post by Ripduf1 »

Here is an image of my X interior. The cutout on mine is a bit neater however if I were you, I would not worry about the cutout being different. I would just touch it up so it doesn't appear to be a fresh cut. Note the orientation of the needle cup holder on my machine. I think you are in good shape with your machine and dont need anything. You may want to move things back to being "right handed". John

PS Post a picture of your motor and some of us could confirm if it is correct or not.
Attachments
20160415_120000_resized.jpg
Horns rolled and straightened

Post Reply