I recently had the great fortune of acquiring a machine I never expected to own. Amidst attending to ailing family members and working on a music recording project I made the time to pick this machine up, which from the photo that was initially supplied I was figuring it was nickel-plated. After I picked it up and was able to examine the machine it was obvious it was a gold-plated Model D Triumph.
The machine was once factory-equipped with a repeater however this was not present with the machine when I acquired it, nor was the horn or crane. I was told that this Triumph had been in the same family since at least the 1960's. The gentlemen who previously owned the phonograph informed me his father remembered it having a "cherry wood" horn, which I assume was actually a Mahogany horn.
Based on the price figures in Frow's book it looks like this machine was over double the cost of a typical Model D Triumph with a Cygnet horn. The serial number for this D seems high to me as I've been under the impression the Triumph serial range tops out around 90,000 but I suppose the same serial number wonkiness in found in other models may apply to Triumphs as well?
A neat find
- long_island_phono
- Victor II
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:58 am
A neat find
Last edited by long_island_phono on Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
gramophone78
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: Western Canada
Re: A neat find
Unless it's the camera flash....it appears to be nickel plated..
. Nice find..
.
-
Onlinephonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 8167
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: A neat find
Holy Toledo! Someone rubbed off all that gold plating...!
I can come to terms with neglect, but deliberate depredation by fools just bewilders me. Whoever did this probably didn't realize it was gold plate, and thought he was polishing it up nicely. Gawd...
There - - that feels better. It's still a pretty cool machine. You seem to have phenomenal luck finding nicer machines in the wild; congratulations!
George P.
I can come to terms with neglect, but deliberate depredation by fools just bewilders me. Whoever did this probably didn't realize it was gold plate, and thought he was polishing it up nicely. Gawd...
There - - that feels better. It's still a pretty cool machine. You seem to have phenomenal luck finding nicer machines in the wild; congratulations!
George P.
-
Onlinephonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 8167
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: A neat find
That's what I was hoping too, but the lid latches and areas around screw heads, pulley flanges, etc. reveal the awful truth...gramophone78 wrote:Unless it's the camera flash....it appears to be nickel plated... Nice find..
.
George P.
-
gramophone78
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: Western Canada
Re: A neat find
Oh my goodness. I see what you mean. What a shame. As you say, someone probably thought it was tarnish or ?? and decided to spruce it up.phonogfp wrote:That's what I was hoping too, but the lid latches and areas around screw heads, pulley flanges, etc. reveal the awful truth...gramophone78 wrote:Unless it's the camera flash....it appears to be nickel plated... Nice find..
.
George P.
Still a great find though.
- long_island_phono
- Victor II
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:58 am
Re: A neat find
I bet the same doofus who wiped the topworks did the cheesy repair work to the top frame.gramophone78 wrote:Oh my goodness. I see what you mean. What a shame. As you say, someone probably thought it was tarnish or ?? and decided to spruce it up.phonogfp wrote:That's what I was hoping too, but the lid latches and areas around screw heads, pulley flanges, etc. reveal the awful truth...gramophone78 wrote:Unless it's the camera flash....it appears to be nickel plated... Nice find..
.
George P.
Still a great find though.
Thanks, George! I thought getting a Hexaphone was pretty cool but this certainly takes the cake!phonogfp wrote:Holy Toledo! Someone rubbed off all that gold plating...!![]()
I can come to terms with neglect, but deliberate depredation by fools just bewilders me. Whoever did this probably didn't realize it was gold plate, and thought he was polishing it up nicely. Gawd...![]()
There - - that feels better. It's still a pretty cool machine. You seem to have phenomenal luck finding nicer machines in the wild; congratulations!![]()
George P.
-
Garret
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:07 pm
- Location: Lille, France
Re: A neat find
A neat find? That's a once-in-a-lifetime find. 
-
A Ford 1
- Victor II
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 1:55 pm
Re: A neat find
Yes this is a lovely phonograph! It is a shame the horn is missing. I must be missing something as I do not see the serial number stated, so I ask what is the serial number?
Thank you,
Allen
Thank you,
Allen
-
Onlinephonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 8167
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: A neat find
It's No.81925. That's well within the documented range of Model D Triumphs.A Ford 1 wrote: I must be missing something as I do not see the serial number stated, so I ask what is the serial number?
Thank you,
Allen
George P.
- long_island_phono
- Victor II
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:58 am
Re: A neat find
George, was there a thread a few years ago regarding Triumph serial data? Would you happen to have a link on hand if there is one?phonogfp wrote:It's No.81925. That's well within the documented range of Model D Triumphs.A Ford 1 wrote: I must be missing something as I do not see the serial number stated, so I ask what is the serial number?
Thank you,
Allen![]()
George P.