Difference between Columbia machines.

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Post Reply
obmcclintock
Victor I
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 10:10 pm
Personal Text: What can be cranked turns my crank.
Location: Central Minnesota

Difference between Columbia machines.

Post by obmcclintock »

Can one of you experts please tell me the difference between a Columbia eagle and a B? Thank you.

clevelander
Victor II
Posts: 275
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:06 pm
Location: Guisborough Yorks

Re: Difference between Columbia machines.

Post by clevelander »

The Columbia model B phonograph was introduced with a price of $10. The $10 coin at the time was called an Eagle due to it's design, hence the nickname of the machine.
Alistair.

Phonofreak
Victor VI
Posts: 3720
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:00 pm
Location: Western, WA State

Re: Difference between Columbia machines.

Post by Phonofreak »

They are both the same machine, but different names.
Harvey Kravitz

obmcclintock
Victor I
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 10:10 pm
Personal Text: What can be cranked turns my crank.
Location: Central Minnesota

Re: Difference between Columbia machines.

Post by obmcclintock »

Thanks guys!

obmcclintock
Victor I
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 10:10 pm
Personal Text: What can be cranked turns my crank.
Location: Central Minnesota

Re: Difference between Columbia machines.

Post by obmcclintock »

I purchased an Eagle earlier and it has an unmarked floating reproducer on it. I was told that this type is not original to that machine and that the original type has the word reproducer engraved on the back of it. Can one of you tell me please the problem with using the unmarked type on this type of machine if any? I forgot pics so I added a couple. Thank you.
Attachments
DSCN4707[1].JPG
DSCN4705[1].JPG
Last edited by obmcclintock on Fri Aug 12, 2016 8:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
TinfoilPhono
Victor V
Posts: 2042
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:48 pm
Location: SF Bay Area, Calif.

Re: Difference between Columbia machines.

Post by TinfoilPhono »

A picture would help. It might be a Type Q reproducer, which is angled differently and isn't ideal for an Eagle. Or it might be one of the many European knockoffs. The latter should work fine.

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8171
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Difference between Columbia machines.

Post by phonogfp »

The unmarked reproducer in your photos is a later "D" reproducer - - a perfectly acceptable upgrade to the original type.

Your machine has early style spring barrels, so it should carry a serial number less than about 145,000. Those mainsprings and serial number date it to no later than mid-1898; several years before the later "D" reproducer was introduced. Still, the "D" plays better than the original type "Eagle" reproducer, so even earlier examples of the Type B are often found with them. Enjoy it! :)

George P.

Post Reply