Difference between Columbia machines.
-
obmcclintock
- Victor I
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 10:10 pm
- Personal Text: What can be cranked turns my crank.
- Location: Central Minnesota
Difference between Columbia machines.
Can one of you experts please tell me the difference between a Columbia eagle and a B? Thank you.
-
clevelander
- Victor II
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:06 pm
- Location: Guisborough Yorks
Re: Difference between Columbia machines.
The Columbia model B phonograph was introduced with a price of $10. The $10 coin at the time was called an Eagle due to it's design, hence the nickname of the machine.
Alistair.
Alistair.
-
Phonofreak
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:00 pm
- Location: Western, WA State
Re: Difference between Columbia machines.
They are both the same machine, but different names.
Harvey Kravitz
Harvey Kravitz
-
obmcclintock
- Victor I
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 10:10 pm
- Personal Text: What can be cranked turns my crank.
- Location: Central Minnesota
Re: Difference between Columbia machines.
Thanks guys!
-
obmcclintock
- Victor I
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 10:10 pm
- Personal Text: What can be cranked turns my crank.
- Location: Central Minnesota
Re: Difference between Columbia machines.
I purchased an Eagle earlier and it has an unmarked floating reproducer on it. I was told that this type is not original to that machine and that the original type has the word reproducer engraved on the back of it. Can one of you tell me please the problem with using the unmarked type on this type of machine if any? I forgot pics so I added a couple. Thank you.
Last edited by obmcclintock on Fri Aug 12, 2016 8:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- TinfoilPhono
- Victor V
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:48 pm
- Location: SF Bay Area, Calif.
Re: Difference between Columbia machines.
A picture would help. It might be a Type Q reproducer, which is angled differently and isn't ideal for an Eagle. Or it might be one of the many European knockoffs. The latter should work fine.
- phonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 8171
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: Difference between Columbia machines.
The unmarked reproducer in your photos is a later "D" reproducer - - a perfectly acceptable upgrade to the original type.
Your machine has early style spring barrels, so it should carry a serial number less than about 145,000. Those mainsprings and serial number date it to no later than mid-1898; several years before the later "D" reproducer was introduced. Still, the "D" plays better than the original type "Eagle" reproducer, so even earlier examples of the Type B are often found with them. Enjoy it!
George P.
Your machine has early style spring barrels, so it should carry a serial number less than about 145,000. Those mainsprings and serial number date it to no later than mid-1898; several years before the later "D" reproducer was introduced. Still, the "D" plays better than the original type "Eagle" reproducer, so even earlier examples of the Type B are often found with them. Enjoy it!
George P.