Do the HMV No5 and No4 have the same rear flange? PLEASE!!!!

Share your phonograph repair & restoration techniques here
Post Reply
User avatar
12jslater
Victor II
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:11 pm
Location: Wolverhampton, Uk
Contact:

Do the HMV No5 and No4 have the same rear flange? PLEASE!!!!

Post by 12jslater »

I need to know as soon as possible.

Thanks, Jake

JerryVan
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6472
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
Location: Southeast MI

Re: Do the HMV No5 and No4 have the same rear flange? PLEASE

Post by JerryVan »

You might get better & more immediate response by posting your question in the foreign makes category.

Phono48
Victor IV
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Do the HMV No5 and No4 have the same rear flange? PLEASE

Post by Phono48 »

The No.5 has a larger flange fitting than the No.4, but the flanges are interchangeable, as the outer size is the same.

Barry
Last edited by Phono48 on Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
12jslater
Victor II
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:11 pm
Location: Wolverhampton, Uk
Contact:

Re: Do the HMV No5 and No4 have the same rear flange? PLEASE

Post by 12jslater »

thank you so much!

User avatar
gramophone-georg
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4332
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA

Re: Do the HMV No5 and No4 have the same rear flange? PLEASE

Post by gramophone-georg »

Not so fast.

I've heard that Victrola 4 and Orthophonic reproducers can be adapted by swapping flanges over and over on this side of the pond as well... but it just ain't so. the Victrola #4 flange just swims in an Orthophonic reproducer. It could be adapted with a rubber sleeve but it's most definitely NOT a "bolt on" swap.

I have both HMV and Victrola #4 reproducers here and they both use the same flange. Just to verify, I'll pull the #5 repro off my HMV 104 to check, but if I recall correctly the HMV #5 again takes the same flange as the Orthophonic.

I'll update this later HMV to HMV, but my gut and memory tells me that it won't work without some slight mods.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek

I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar

User avatar
gramophone-georg
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4332
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA

Re: Do the HMV No5 and No4 have the same rear flange? PLEASE

Post by gramophone-georg »

Reporting back on this... the #4 flange definitely fits the HMV #5a reproducer better than the Orthophonic, but it still isn't a firm fit- it just drops right in and isn't quite a flush fit at all. It'll wobble for sure on the two set screws. Maybe a single wrap of black electrical tape around the outer edge of the #4 flange will make it work fine but there is a definite difference in circumference here.

EDIT: It could also be the repro #4 flanges I'm getting, too.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek

I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar

User avatar
epigramophone
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 5679
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:21 pm
Personal Text: An analogue relic trapped in a digital world.
Location: The Somerset Levels, UK.

Re: Do the HMV No5 and No4 have the same rear flange? PLEASE

Post by epigramophone »

I have an HMV No.5b soundbox which a previous owner has fitted with a No.4 flange, no doubt to update an earlier machine. The flange is a perfect fit.

Another word of warning though. I have seen many HMV soundboxes damaged by ham-fisted attempts at removing the flange, so proceed with caution especially when undoing the securing screw. Old pot metal needs gentle treatment.

Phono48
Victor IV
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Do the HMV No5 and No4 have the same rear flange? PLEASE

Post by Phono48 »

Coincidentally, yesterday I saw in our local antique centre a bog-standard black 101, priced at £210.00!!! I have bought a couple of 101s from him before, so asked politely why so expensive? His answer was because it had a "very rare" No.5B soundbox that "was specially made for the 101 and was only made for a very short time". He wouldn't accept my explanation that the flange was interchangeable, despite my pointing out that the 5B was chrome, whilst the rest of the fittings were nickel. The idiot shouldn't be allowed to sell gramophones!

Post Reply