I also thought that the take dot/s mustn't have printed properly, but I've found 5 in my collection without them, but everything else is printed very clearly.JohnM wrote: I have a number of cylinders that don't appear to have any 'dot', but there is a mold number.
(1945, 1993, 2007, 2032, & 2098)
It's almost as if someone forgot to include them on the molds.
It's a shame they are all direct recordings. Had they been DD dubs, I could have checked the take numbers. With the mold no. appearing so close after PAT'D, if a 3rd or 4th take had been used, it would be reasonable to assume the take dots were never included due to lack of space between the two..