REPRODUCER CHANGE LID LABELS BY CURT.

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Post Reply
tomb
Victor IV
Posts: 1425
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:46 pm
Location: riverside calif

REPRODUCER CHANGE LID LABELS BY CURT.

Post by tomb »

Here is a picture of Curts labels installed. They look very nice, for all that need to replace the old chipped labels. I used orange shellac to put it on.
Attachments
trial lid that is on a standard D
trial lid that is on a standard D
after new label
after new label
original label
original label

User avatar
Curt A
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6892
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:32 pm
Personal Text: Needle Tins are Addictive
Location: Belmont, North Carolina

Re: REPRODUCER CHANGE LID LABELS BY CURT.

Post by Curt A »

Thanks, Tom for the referral... still have a few left.
Curt
"The phonograph† is not of any commercial value."
Thomas Alva Edison - Comment to his assistant, Samuel Insull.

"No one needs a Victrola XX, a Perfected Graphophone Type G, or whatever you call those noisy things."
My Wife

Phonofreak
Victor VI
Posts: 3720
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:00 pm
Location: Western, WA State

Re: REPRODUCER CHANGE LID LABELS BY CURT.

Post by Phonofreak »

Sure looks nice. I'm hard pressed to tell it from an original.
Great job Curt.
Harvey Kravitz

User avatar
NEFaurora
Victor IV
Posts: 1214
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:02 pm
Personal Text: "A Phonograph in every home..."
Location: Melbourne, FL (Former New Yorker!)

Re: REPRODUCER CHANGE LID LABELS BY CURT.

Post by NEFaurora »

Just curious...

It seems that the below Original has more of a ¼ inch blank border space on the top and the bottom...

Curt, Was it hard to provide some extra space on the top and the bottom? Or was this an issue...? Otherwise, It looks really good. The absence of some space on the top and the bottom gives it the slight appearance of being "crammed"..

Just an observation..


Tony K.

Edison Collector/Restorer

User avatar
Curt A
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6892
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:32 pm
Personal Text: Needle Tins are Addictive
Location: Belmont, North Carolina

Re: REPRODUCER CHANGE LID LABELS BY CURT.

Post by Curt A »

The paper size is the original size. Since the original font is set in an unknown point size, the new labels are set in the closest available font & size, which takes up a bit more space... The labels could be made larger than original to leave the space, but size seems to be more important in my opinion. Also, since the original labels were just printed in whatever size, I expect the paper could have been cut to various sizes on different machines... who knows... Even with a side to side comparison, I doubt the differences wouldn't matter, besides where else can you get a replacement if yours is messed up or missing?
"The phonograph† is not of any commercial value."
Thomas Alva Edison - Comment to his assistant, Samuel Insull.

"No one needs a Victrola XX, a Perfected Graphophone Type G, or whatever you call those noisy things."
My Wife

User avatar
NEFaurora
Victor IV
Posts: 1214
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:02 pm
Personal Text: "A Phonograph in every home..."
Location: Melbourne, FL (Former New Yorker!)

Re: REPRODUCER CHANGE LID LABELS BY CURT.

Post by NEFaurora »

Well, You of course!

Put me down for one..

Curt, Send me a Private PM on here and/or e-mail to my email address at [email protected] with your Paypal address so I can send you payment for one.

Thanks

Tony K.

Edison Collector/Restorer

User avatar
NEFaurora
Victor IV
Posts: 1214
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:02 pm
Personal Text: "A Phonograph in every home..."
Location: Melbourne, FL (Former New Yorker!)

Re: REPRODUCER CHANGE LID LABELS BY CURT.

Post by NEFaurora »

Yeah Curt, Just looking back at it again, I think that it would be better in my opinion to cut the paper a bit longer and leave some space on the top and on the bottom on the next run of them.. It would look much better and would not be much longer..

Yes, Size is always a consideration, but so is the overall look of the item. I think a balance between the two is the overall best answer here. ..and there is more than enough room to work with underneath the phonograph lid.

I think the final answer on this one is to make the length of the paper cuts at both ends a bit longer.. To make it look "Right".. The Original actually looks like it has a bit more space at the top then at the bottom if you look. Another observation..

Tony K.

Edison Collector/Restorer

Post Reply