Why were early records only recorded on one side?

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8250
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Why were early records only recorded on one side?

Post by phonogfp »

Starkton wrote: After settling the dispute with Frederic Prescott about the Petit patent, the Gramophone Co., from March 1905, also manufactured double-sided records.
I'm no authority on European/English record production, but I was surprised to learn this!

George P.

victorIIvictor
Victor II
Posts: 380
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:26 pm
Location: Just a smidgen north of Oakland, CA

Re: Why were early records only recorded on one side?

Post by victorIIvictor »

Thanks to George Paul and Starkton for your informative posts.

Best wishes, Mark

Sidewinder
Victor III
Posts: 799
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:51 am

Re: Why were early records only recorded on one side?

Post by Sidewinder »

My father always said it was because you could sell twice as many recordings!

Twin Records made it very obvious they were selling double sided records, though I doubt they were the first company to do so.
Attachments
twin.JPG
twin.JPG (79.96 KiB) Viewed 813 times

User avatar
epigramophone
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 5766
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:21 pm
Personal Text: An analogue relic trapped in a digital world.
Location: The Somerset Levels, UK.

Re: Why were early records only recorded on one side?

Post by epigramophone »

Twins were the first double sided disc records to be sold, anonymously, by The Gramophone Company in the UK. They were introduced in 1908 in response to the German made double sided imports which had been selling in the UK since 1905. From 1911 records from the Twin catalogue were pressed as Zonophones, but the Twin label was later revived for some overseas markets.

Post Reply