Do you think that is how they were shipped back in the day? Cheers, Russie
Edit: I mean, one has to wonder how they dealt with shipping back then.
New Suitcase Home - Shipping Disaster Averted!
- startgroove
- Victor III
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:01 pm
- Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
- mick_vt
- Victor I
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:09 pm
- Personal Text: Foxtrotaholic
- Location: Central Vermont
Re: New Suitcase Home - Shipping Disaster Averted!
Wooden crates with the heavy stuff bolted in tightly and excelsior for padding on the smaller stuffstartgroove wrote:Do you think that is how they were shipped back in the day? Cheers, Russie
Edit: I mean, one has to wonder how they dealt with shipping back then.
- Raphael
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:44 am
- Location: Davie, FL
- Contact:
Re: New Suitcase Home - Shipping Disaster Averted!
Absolutely correct, especially about removing the mechanism. The only Edisons I ship without doing so are Gems and Firesides.Fonotone wrote:Actually, you should have requested that the seller remove the mechanism from the cabinet and ship the two separately. Double-boxed. 3" of styrofoam sheets, or even 4", or 5", or 6" would have yielded the same results as a single 1" sheet if the package was upended at some point in transit, which I'm almost certain is what happened.startgroove wrote:Good advice Jerry. I think I will relay packing requests to my future mail order buys. Here is an example of a recent such purchase. I now regret not telling the seller my packing preferences. This one came packed sitting on its feet, with one inch layer of Styrofoam sheet on the top. The box gave no indication of the damage inside. I should have requested 3" of padding all around.
-- Grant
It’s also pertinent to point out here that most dealers I know are expert at packing and shipping. When buying from anybody else, you take your chances. A few bucks saved on a “great deal” can lead to a lot of regrets.
Raphael