old Columbia phonograph ..just obtained

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
wjw
Victor II
Posts: 472
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:57 pm
Location: greater bubbaville

Re: old Columbia phonograph ..just obtained

Post by wjw »

:mrgreen:

Ken S
Victor Jr
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2020 12:55 pm
Personal Text: Canada

Re: old Columbia phonograph ..just obtained

Post by Ken S »

to get new screws (to put the lid back on) I assume slotted screws would have been original .. one person said don't use Philips ... but here in Canada we have Robinson (a square instead of star shaped screw drever) which would not be original either :) ..... also I was real surprised that you were supposed to use a NEW needle after playing only one record (2 sides) :o . If you had music night ... that would go through a lot of needles :shock:

User avatar
fran604g
Victor VI
Posts: 3994
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:22 pm
Personal Text: I'm Feeling Cranky
Location: Hemlock, NY

Re: old Columbia phonograph ..just obtained

Post by fran604g »

Ken S wrote:to get new screws (to put the lid back on) I assume slotted screws would have been original .. one person said don't use Philips ... but here in Canada we have Robinson (a square instead of star shaped screw drever) which would not be original either :) ..... also I was real surprised that you were supposed to use a NEW needle after playing only one record (2 sides) :o . If you had music night ... that would go through a lot of needles :shock:
Actually, (not to be pedantic) each side should have a new needle used. Others may disagree, but I've seen that as being the manufacturer's recommendation. The needle is shaped (sharpened into a point) from just one use. The groove on the other side of the record would never match the point of the needle from the previous use, and will act like a chisel point causing undue wear to the record.

Fran
Francis; "i" for him, "e" for her
"Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while" - the unappreciative supervisor.

User avatar
Henry
Victor V
Posts: 2624
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:01 am
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania

Re: old Columbia phonograph ..just obtained

Post by Henry »

Ken S wrote:to get new screws (to put the lid back on) I assume slotted screws would have been original .. one person said don't use Philips ... but here in Canada we have Robinson (a square instead of star shaped screw drever) which would not be original either :) ..... also I was real surprised that you were supposed to use a NEW needle after playing only one record (2 sides) :o . If you had music night ... that would go through a lot of needles :shock:
Needles are cheap, especially if purchased in quantity--- 1,000 should last you for quite a while. I have a couple of packets (100 per) each of medium and loud needles, but most of my listening is done with soft-tones, so I bought those in quantity.

User avatar
drh
Victor IV
Posts: 1435
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 12:24 pm
Personal Text: A Pathé record...with care will live to speak to your grandchildren when they are as old as you are
Location: Silver Spring, MD

Re: old Columbia phonograph ..just obtained

Post by drh »

fran604g wrote:
Ken S wrote:to get new screws (to put the lid back on) I assume slotted screws would have been original .. one person said don't use Philips ... but here in Canada we have Robinson (a square instead of star shaped screw drever) which would not be original either :) ..... also I was real surprised that you were supposed to use a NEW needle after playing only one record (2 sides) :o . If you had music night ... that would go through a lot of needles :shock:
Actually, (not to be pedantic) each side should have a new needle used. Others may disagree, but I've seen that as being the manufacturer's recommendation. The needle is shaped (sharpened into a point) from just one use. The groove on the other side of the record would never match the point of the needle from the previous use, and will act like a chisel point causing undue wear to the record.

Fran
A case in point: Last night a friend and I were playing records, and on one Victor disk the two sides were recorded some eight years apart--hence, not with the same cutter stylus, probably not with the same cutter head, maybe not even at the same speed (didn't check that too closely). One side played best on modern gear with a 2.8 mil truncated elliptical, the other with a 3.0 mil spherical and an entirely different cartridge. About as different as could be, but ganged together on the two sides of a single record.

Post Reply