Berliner Trademark Evolution Question

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
User avatar
Zwebie
Victor IV
Posts: 1460
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:55 pm
Personal Text: We are only the caretakers for future generations.
Location: FLORIDA

Re: Berliner Trademark Evolution Question

Post by Zwebie »

The latest Berliner "Improved Gramophone" I've observed is #34983, and it carries a celluloid plate where the Berliner decal is typically mounted (on occasion, the decal can been seen beneath these plates). These celluloid plates are labeled "Berliner Gramophone Company, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A." with no mention of the National Gramo. Corp. Only the very last Berliners will be found with these celluloid plates on the cabinet.

Hope this helps - -

George P.
WOW George, look at this! #35523
Attachments
35523.jpg
Johnson Fleur-de-lis J35523.jpg

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 7964
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Berliner Trademark Evolution Question

Post by phonogfp »

Thanks Bob, but isn't that a Johnson Type B?

George P.

User avatar
Zwebie
Victor IV
Posts: 1460
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:55 pm
Personal Text: We are only the caretakers for future generations.
Location: FLORIDA

Re: Berliner Trademark Evolution Question

Post by Zwebie »

Thanks Bob, but isn't that a Johnson Type B?

George P.
Yes George, but it has the five screw spring case that was used on the "late" Berliners and the Johnson "Consolidated Talking Machine Co." Trademarks with the celluloid tag!

Was Johnson using up "old-stock" to produce the first ERJ "Fluer-de-lis" B's?

Bob S.

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Berliner Trademark Evolution Question

Post by gramophone78 »

Bob,
I have a question regarding your type B. The last two digits on the data plate appear to have been re-stamped. The last digit...."9" you can make out what seems to be the number "1". Do you think the factory did this to match the the spring barrel marked with "B"...??.

User avatar
Zwebie
Victor IV
Posts: 1460
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:55 pm
Personal Text: We are only the caretakers for future generations.
Location: FLORIDA

Re: Berliner Trademark Evolution Question

Post by Zwebie »

Bob,
I have a question regarding your type B. The last two digits on the data plate appear to have been re-stamped. The last digit...."9" you can clearly make out the number "1". Do you think the factory did this to match the the spring barrel marked with "B"...??.
Wayne, that's the million dollar question!
When I purchased this machine years ago, all metal parts were painted with a heavy coating of zinc fence paint.
When I cleaned them up they look as they do now.
Anything is possible on a machine this old. Possible guesses are: Factory done repair?, Aftermarket repair?, Collector/Restorer repair?
It all adds to the unique history of the item, but I guess I'll never know.
I was encouraged to see another ERJ "Fluer-de-lis" "B" with the same motor.

Bob S.

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Berliner Trademark Evolution Question

Post by gramophone78 »

Zwebie wrote:
Bob,
I have a question regarding your type B. The last two digits on the data plate appear to have been re-stamped. The last digit...."9" you can clearly make out the number "1". Do you think the factory did this to match the the spring barrel marked with "B"...??.
Wayne, that's the million dollar question!
When I purchased this machine years ago, all metal parts were painted with a heavy coating of zinc fence paint.
When I cleaned them up they look as they do now.
Anything is possible on a machine this old. Possible guesses are: Factory done repair?, Aftermarket repair?, Collector/Restorer repair?
It all adds to the unique history of the item, but I guess I'll never know.
I was encouraged to see another ERJ "Fluer-de-lis" "B" with the same motor.

Bob S.
Very interesting Bob. Have you looked at the last two digits on the data plate with a loupe...?. Could they have been 51 originally..??. I won't be surprise if Johnson used up existing motors that were assembled and already stamped in sequence in his new Type B. If so, I wonder if some motors were used in the type A and stamped with an A over the J...???.
What a great mystery indeed... :coffee:.

Post Reply