What is your ugliest machine?

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
User avatar
Roaring20s
Victor V
Posts: 2808
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:55 am
Personal Text: Those who were seen dancing were thought insane by those who could not hear the music. Nietzsche
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: What is your ugliest machine?

Post by Roaring20s »

:shock: Calling these ugly, is cruel and unnecessary. :)
They are better described as fantastic, bizarre, or grotesque.

Whatever other's behold, I look upon them, admiring and appreciating there visual uniqueness.
"I'm not bad. I'm just drawn that way." - Jessica Rabbit :rose: in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit"
https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/aa1c25ef-a ... 3139a70496

What's project through one, could be downright yucky. :monkey:

I look forward for more fantastic, bizarre, or grotesque phonographs.

James.

Victor VII
Victor I
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:14 pm

Re: What is your ugliest machine?

Post by Victor VII »

Actually, I rather like some of the machines posted-particularly Jerry's Modernola. Ironic that it has a lamp, but we can't see it too well because of the lighting. When you've seen lots of units after collecting for years, the idiosyncratic machines have their own special aesthetic...Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!

User avatar
Curt A
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6892
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:32 pm
Personal Text: Needle Tins are Addictive
Location: Belmont, North Carolina

Re: What is your ugliest machine?

Post by Curt A »

TinfoilPhono wrote:
Curt A wrote:Rene,
What is that horn?
That is an Echo-Tone, marketed with little success in 1908. It was advertised in Talking Machine World, but the ads kept getting smaller until they finally disappeared.
Thanks for identifying it, I really like it... Probably a needle in a haystack to find one. It's an interesting variation of a Cygnet horn, without a crane being necessary...
"The phonograph† is not of any commercial value."
Thomas Alva Edison - Comment to his assistant, Samuel Insull.

"No one needs a Victrola XX, a Perfected Graphophone Type G, or whatever you call those noisy things."
My Wife

User avatar
drh
Victor IV
Posts: 1478
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 12:24 pm
Personal Text: A Pathé record...with care will live to speak to your grandchildren when they are as old as you are
Location: Silver Spring, MD

Re: What is your ugliest machine?

Post by drh »

Curt A wrote:
TinfoilPhono wrote:
Curt A wrote:Rene,
What is that horn?
That is an Echo-Tone, marketed with little success in 1908. It was advertised in Talking Machine World, but the ads kept getting smaller until they finally disappeared.
Thanks for identifying it, I really like it... Probably a needle in a haystack to find one. It's an interesting variation of a Cygnet horn, without a crane being necessary...
A Pathé machine working on much the same principle is on eBay at the moment (and has been for some time).
Attachments
Pathe machine.jpg

VanEpsFan1914
Victor VI
Posts: 3400
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:39 am
Personal Text: I've got both kinds of music--classical & rag-time.
Location: South Carolina

Re: What is your ugliest machine?

Post by VanEpsFan1914 »

Victor VII wrote:Actually, I rather like some of the machines posted-particularly Jerry's Modernola. Ironic that it has a lamp, but we can't see it too well because of the lighting. When you've seen lots of units after collecting for years, the idiosyncratic machines have their own special aesthetic...!
Roaring20s wrote: I look upon them, admiring and appreciating there visual uniqueness.
This was about the kind of reaction I have to phonographs in general, even the inside-out horns. The Modernola is awesome, not ugly: the H-19s would fit Arts & Crafts decor and even the old Victrola 210s would be better described as "understated."

Victrola XIIs are not "pretty" necessarily but they are unique.

I like this.

My "ugliest" would have to be--well, I like them all. I kind of think Edison C-250s are overdoing it and I even like the BC-34s. But in the right setting they all look pretty good.

Glad to see everyone enjoys phonographs of all sizes and styles!

User avatar
travisgreyfox
Victor IV
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2017 9:25 pm

Re: What is your ugliest machine?

Post by travisgreyfox »

I think most of these machines are not ugly...Tacky yes, but not ugly

schweg
Victor III
Posts: 805
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: okc ok

Re: What is your ugliest machine?

Post by schweg »

Nowhere near as fantastic as the previous machines with their rare and unusual horns, here is an HMV Model V. It was produced Nov. 1910- Aug. 1913. According to his Masters Gramophone by Oakley and Proudfoot, on page 33- "The original heavy plinth was disliked by the German branch (who considered it so ugly as to make the Monarch unsaleabe)". Total sales 2,686. I think it looks great, and am happy to report the machine is doing well after therapy.
20200404_123655.jpg
20200404_123643.jpg
Attachments
20200404_123621~2.jpg

Jerry B.
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8759
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:25 am
Personal Text: Stop for a visit when in Oregon.
Location: Albany, Oregon

Re: What is your ugliest machine?

Post by Jerry B. »

Here's one that was made in India years ago. I bought it at Union a few years ago because DeeDee loves bling. As part of my inventory project I took it to her favorite jewelers and asked about its construction. He said it's silver plate over ivory. Does it quality as "ugly?"

Jerry
Attachments
IMG_4958.JPG

User avatar
Roaring20s
Victor V
Posts: 2808
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:55 am
Personal Text: Those who were seen dancing were thought insane by those who could not hear the music. Nietzsche
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: What is your ugliest machine?

Post by Roaring20s »

That is beautiful!!! :rose:

James.

User avatar
audiophile102
Victor IV
Posts: 1242
Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 12:50 pm
Personal Text: Say to yourself I am so happy hurray!
Location: Brookfield, Illinois

Re: What is your ugliest machine?

Post by audiophile102 »

Jerry B. wrote:Here's one that was made in India years ago. I bought it at Union a few years ago because DeeDee loves bling. As part of my inventory project I took it to her favorite jewelers and asked about its construction. He said it's silver plate over ivory. Does it quality as "ugly?"

Jerry
I have to side with DeeDee on this one. Way cool.
"You can't take the phonographs nor the money with you, but the contentment the phonographs bring may well make your life better, and happier lives make the world a better place."

Post Reply