And here's the Caliburn. Pretty widely regarded as among the best turntable systems (minus cartridge) being sold today.
The price? If you have to ask...
http://www.ultimateavmag.com/content/co ... -turntable
needleless laser record player
-
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1002
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:22 am
Re: needleless laser record player
WOW... words really do fail... never seen, or even imagined anything like it.gregbogantz wrote:It's interesting that you should inquire about the availability of hi-bux analog turntables today. If there was any doubt that golden ears have become any more rational in the last coupla decades, we can rest assured that they are still as delusional as ever. Check out these eBay offerings:
This one takes the prize for the most preposterously over-the-top waste of time, money, and resources:
eBay Item #300475975562
Words really fail to convey the utter silliness of this thing.




-
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:00 am
Re: needleless laser record player
The Thorens Reference was my dream turntable 25 years ago when I left school. The price then was about $25,000. Today the Thorens is a collector's item with a near fourfold value.

PS: I checked again. Original purchase price in 1982 was "only" about $10,000 (without tonearms). This makes it an even better investment.

PS: I checked again. Original purchase price in 1982 was "only" about $10,000 (without tonearms). This makes it an even better investment.
Last edited by Starkton on Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
- AllWoundUp
- Victor I
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunnyvale, California
Re: needleless laser record player
I also like how on the first 2 ebay auctions, he says don't bother him with questions about them if you haven't read the "ads", and yet there's no description of the turntables beyond the make & model.
- Wolfe
- Victor V
- Posts: 2759
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm
Re: needleless laser record player
Talk about massive. If that thing weighs 200 pounds, I wouldn't be the least surprised.Starkton wrote:Thorens Reference dream turntable.
Makes that l'il old laser record player look pretty flimsy by comparison.
-
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:00 am
Re: needleless laser record player
It is 180 pounds which is only a little more than the gramophone of 1908 I just got which is 130 pounds net weight.Wolfe wrote: Talk about massive. If that thing weighs 200 pounds, I wouldn't be the least surprised.
- antique1973
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1281
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:30 am
- Personal Text: Victor Z, Victrola 4-3
Re: needleless laser record player
My $200 Audio Technica paired with vintage Bose speakers is fancy
enough for me.
enough for me.

-
- Victor I
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:21 pm
Re: needleless laser record player
Hah, you sure that isn't the Genesis Device from "Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan"?? Is that price just a mistake or out of thin air, or is that the actual going price for these contraptions I wonder.phonophan79 wrote: This one takes the prize for the most preposterously over-the-top waste of time, money, and resources:
eBay Item #300475975562