I’ve been wondering why Edison went from copper Diaphragms in the earlier reproducers to rice paper and cork in the diamond reproducers. While the diamond reproducers sound fine, it does beg the question why and I don’t recall ever hearing why they did this. When I use my model N on a blue amberol I would say that it almost sounds better to some degree.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Gerald.
Copper Vs. Rice Paper diaphragm
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 7:57 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- poodling around
- Victor V
- Posts: 2313
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 am
Re: Copper Vs. Rice Paper diaphragm
VictorVV-X wrote:I’ve been wondering why Edison went from copper Diaphragms in the earlier reproducers to rice paper and cork in the diamond reproducers. While the diamond reproducers sound fine, it does beg the question why and I don’t recall ever hearing why they did this. When I use my model N on a blue amberol I would say that it almost sounds better to some degree.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Gerald.
Using cork as diaphragms is something I didn't know and I am surprised. I imagine they were 'compacted' and rock hard ?
Interesting indeed.
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 7:57 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Copper Vs. Rice Paper diaphragm
It was not completely cork. From what I understand cork was use to stiffen the main diaphragm made from rice paper.poodling around wrote:VictorVV-X wrote:I’ve been wondering why Edison went from copper Diaphragms in the earlier reproducers to rice paper and cork in the diamond reproducers. While the diamond reproducers sound fine, it does beg the question why and I don’t recall ever hearing why they did this. When I use my model N on a blue amberol I would say that it almost sounds better to some degree.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Gerald.
Using cork as diaphragms is something I didn't know and I am surprised. I imagine they were 'compacted' and rock hard ?
Interesting indeed.
- poodling around
- Victor V
- Posts: 2313
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 am
Re: Copper Vs. Rice Paper diaphragm
VictorVV-X wrote:It was not completely cork. From what I understand cork was use to stiffen the main diaphragm made from rice paper.poodling around wrote:VictorVV-X wrote:I’ve been wondering why Edison went from copper Diaphragms in the earlier reproducers to rice paper and cork in the diamond reproducers. While the diamond reproducers sound fine, it does beg the question why and I don’t recall ever hearing why they did this. When I use my model N on a blue amberol I would say that it almost sounds better to some degree.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Gerald.
Using cork as diaphragms is something I didn't know and I am surprised. I imagine they were 'compacted' and rock hard ?
Interesting indeed.
Very interesting indeed !
For some reason, this reminds me of when I was at school and we made a Kazoo out of a comb and tracing paper

Anyway, thanks for the information.
-
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 7:54 pm
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 7:57 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Copper Vs. Rice Paper diaphragm
52089, do you have any idea why Edison went to this kind of diaphragm when they introduced the Diamond cylinder reproducers? What was the advantage over copper used in the earlier reproducers?52089 wrote:Here's a pic of a Diamond Disc diaphragm:
https://www.phonographs.org/product/p-3 ... eproducer/
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2019 11:50 am
Re: Copper Vs. Rice Paper diaphragm
I rather assume the paper and cork diaphragm was produced first in 1911 as part of the diamond disc development, the removal of any metallic tone on the diamond discs was possibly desirable and the development closely parallels the disc recording principle applied to the disc where pumping air with a flexible edge and stiff light center was preferred to an inherently resonant diaphragm.
The transfer of the technology to cylinder reproduces with the introduction of the celluloid blue amberol where also more weight can be applied to the record must have seemed sensible and possibly reduced any increased surface noise that might be noticed with the change from wax (wax being smoother when new).
The transfer of the technology to cylinder reproduces with the introduction of the celluloid blue amberol where also more weight can be applied to the record must have seemed sensible and possibly reduced any increased surface noise that might be noticed with the change from wax (wax being smoother when new).
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 7:57 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Copper Vs. Rice Paper diaphragm
recordmaker, thank you for your insight. For some reason I did not completely comprehend that diamond discs and blue amberols were developed around the same time. For some reason I thought that blue amberols came much earlier.recordmaker wrote:I rather assume the paper and cork diaphragm was produced first in 1911 as part of the diamond disc development, the removal of any metallic tone on the diamond discs was possibly desirable and the development closely parallels the disc recording principle applied to the disc where pumping air with a flexible edge and stiff light center was preferred to an inherently resonant diaphragm.
The transfer of the technology to cylinder reproduces with the introduction of the celluloid blue amberol where also more weight can be applied to the record must have seemed sensible and possibly reduced any increased surface noise that might be noticed with the change from wax (wax being smoother when new).
I suppose I understand the desire to cut down on resonance do to a metal diaphragm with the added weight from a diamond reproducer.
That being said, has anyone experimented and installed a metal diaphragm in a diamond reproducer, just to see the affect on performance?