My only branded bamboos are an envelope of Hall bamboos, and as AZ said, the skin is in the inside.
Except for those, from which I used some, then left the rest untouched for the sake of preservation, I only have used my own made bamboo needles since the late Francis James showed me how to make them, firstly by his book, later with some letters we crossed, where he encouraged me and gave useful advice.
I've cut them both ways, but I've noticed no difference in performance. The only thing that 'hurts' me a bit is that if you cut them for the skin to be outside, then the needle fixing screw presses on the skin side, and I've always felt that this could spoil the needle, splitting it along the fibres, for I feel the skinny sidde is more prone to this fragile splitting than the inside, which is softer. When the screw is at the inner side, the skin is in the inside. The screw leaves a tiny perfect cylindrical hole in the soft wood, showing that this inner side is more 'pliable' and not so rigid; it can be pressed without splitting the needle. I bet that the skinny side is more prone to splitting if it is pressed such way...
Anyway, these are mental excursions of a mad collector... don't take them too seriously!
About this, I'm very interested.. I've been lately experimenting with no-skin bamboo needles. While cuttting the needles from the bamboo cylinder, I observed you leave apart the inner trinagular sections that are surplus because they have no skin. I was one day cutting bamboos from a very good piece, seasoned bamboo wood, so dry and solid that it hurt me to throw the surplus needles to the trash. I sized them, and cut them to shape. i used them and surprise! They were as good as the ones with the skin! So it's clear that if the bamboo is good, dry, hard, with straight fibres.... there's no woood to discard. So I started to keep them too, and use them.
Bamboo.jpg