Who has the smallest record collection, by choice?
-
Online
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
- Location: Southeast MI
Re: Who has the smallest record collection, by choice?
Not sure if this translates well to 78's, but when I started buying disc music boxes, I wanted to buy every disc I could find. (ones in nice condition at least) After a while, I discovered all I really needed was maybe 5 or 6 really nice discs, plus maybe a few Christmas tunes.
- Marco Gilardetti
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1515
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:19 am
- Personal Text: F. Depero, "Grammofono", 1923.
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
Re: Who has the smallest record collection, by choice?
Dear Steve, although I get your points, still it's sad to read this. Your deejaying inspired me so much, and although I had ZERO repeat ZERO success at that, still the idea itself inspires so much and it's all beacause of you. So I truly wish that better days will come soon.SteveM wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 11:54 amI've been side-hustling as a DJ for awhile now, so every record I would buy, I would quantify it as a tool which would just help me be more successful at that. As I've gotten older (I'm 52), the thought of lugging heavy equipment and records, for long distances, for very little money or appreciation, has zapped my spirit. The pandemic has only magnified the situation for me. I just don't feel much like playing music in public for people (and have not done it once in the last two years). I'm much less of a "people" person than I used to be.
While I built up a detailed database of my LPs, I never had the same patience with 78s, so I don't know exactly how many I have, but measured in meters (literally) they should be around 600-700. While compared to many other collections mine can be described as a "small" one, still I always have to deal with space problems, so I'm constantly going through my records sorting the ones without which living would have no meaning

Reselling records on eBay is such a boring activity that I much prefer passing them for free. Also, it would require buying specialty boxes etc. for mailing them safely, which would mean more stuff cluttering the house. I would definitely do it for valuable records that are sought after, but that's the exact definition of those that I want to keep for me. So unfortunately I don't have any easy solution for you, and not even a smart hint I'm afraid...
Last edited by Marco Gilardetti on Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:00 am
Re: Who has the smallest record collection, by choice?
[quote="Marco Gilardetti" post_id=308513 time=1643390130 user_id=1182]
I would definitely do it for valuable records that are sought after, but that's the exact definition of those that I want to keep for me.
[/quote]
From the beginning, I have only collected particularly sought-after discs (and a few cylinders), so that I or my heirs will not have any difficulties selling them. They are the kind that are always specially marked in the dealer lists. That's why my collection remains manageable at around 700 discs. I have recently, in my mid-50s, decided that I slow down with collecting and have already started to part with some if the price is right. When you get older, you don't need all that stuff around you.
I would definitely do it for valuable records that are sought after, but that's the exact definition of those that I want to keep for me.
[/quote]
From the beginning, I have only collected particularly sought-after discs (and a few cylinders), so that I or my heirs will not have any difficulties selling them. They are the kind that are always specially marked in the dealer lists. That's why my collection remains manageable at around 700 discs. I have recently, in my mid-50s, decided that I slow down with collecting and have already started to part with some if the price is right. When you get older, you don't need all that stuff around you.