Hello all,
I recently bought a grouping of cranks. This one I'm not sure of. It's about the same size as an outside Victor. The knob is different as photoed. I'd appreciate knowledgeable input. It's ¼" female type. What does this match up to?
Thank you,
D.Edwards
Crank identification question
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:21 pm
-
- Victor III
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:57 pm
- Personal Text: Started collecting in August 2020, small collection of records
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Contact:
Re: Crank identification question
Looks like an Edison to me, but I could be wrong.
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:21 pm
Re: Crank identification question
Thank you, but it it's clearly not an Edison. I would like a knowledgeable collector who might know.
-
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3463
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:21 pm
Re: Crank identification question
I'd say it's Paillard.
In the USA, Paillard's biggest customer was Sonora, so there's a good chance it's from a Sonora, but Ive had literally a dozen or more various off brand machines over the years with Paillard running gear and this same style ¼" female threaded type crank.
In the USA, Paillard's biggest customer was Sonora, so there's a good chance it's from a Sonora, but Ive had literally a dozen or more various off brand machines over the years with Paillard running gear and this same style ¼" female threaded type crank.
-
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3011
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 2:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Crank identification question
Bit rude wasn't it ?ColoradoPhonograf wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 12:05 am Thank you, but it it's clearly not an Edison. I would like a knowledgeable collector who might know.
I would like a knowledgeable collector
- AZ*
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:51 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Crank identification question
I personally didn't think it was rude. I've been collecting for over fifty years, and I didn't recognize it. I looked at the various cranks on my many machines, and I didn't see any similarities so I didn't hazard a guess. In the initial post, the OP asked for "knowledgeable input."
But there are enthusiastic people with only minimal knowledge who are keen to respond.
I think the OP's response was OK.
But there are enthusiastic people with only minimal knowledge who are keen to respond.
I think the OP's response was OK.
Best regards ... AZ*
-
- Victor III
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:58 am
- Location: Pensacola, Fl
Re: Crank identification question
Sorry AZ et al,
The response was rude… this is a public forum where everyone should have free input.. the best response should have been thanks, but I don’t believe it’s Edison and stop…many times even seasoned collectors can overlook the obvious and it’s good to have a second set of eyes…
We have been fighting for years on ways to build up this hobby, yet we keep trying to show how smart we are by tearing each other down…
Everyone just ask how their Mother would respond….I know my Mother would never respond in such a way…
The response was rude… this is a public forum where everyone should have free input.. the best response should have been thanks, but I don’t believe it’s Edison and stop…many times even seasoned collectors can overlook the obvious and it’s good to have a second set of eyes…
We have been fighting for years on ways to build up this hobby, yet we keep trying to show how smart we are by tearing each other down…
Everyone just ask how their Mother would respond….I know my Mother would never respond in such a way…
- Django
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:31 pm
- Location: New Hampshire’s West Coast
Re: Crank identification question
Posting the thread size and the crank’s diameter might help with the identification, or at least eliminate certain machines.
-
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3463
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:21 pm
Re: Crank identification question
It's definitely a Paillard crank.
- Raphael
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1575
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:44 am
- Location: Davie, FL
- Contact:
Re: Crank identification question
Whether or not this was rude, it clearly was not helpful either, because it did not explain why it was "clearly not an Edison". People like me, who have only collected phonographs for 24 years, still have lots to learn. That's why I read the TMF daily.ColoradoPhonograf wrote: Fri Nov 11, 2022 12:05 am Thank you, but it it's clearly not an Edison. I would like a knowledgeable collector who might know.
Raphael