As title. Am I alone in this observation?
Looks to me like the folded horn in the vv-50s sounds better. I have 2 of each here at the moment I put rebuilt
#2s done with Walt Sommers parts all around. The vv-50s seem much cleaner and flatter response from horn.....
Hmmmmmm
Tabletop vv-50s sound better than console vv-80s?
-
- Victor I
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:13 pm
- Personal Text: I know nothing (yet) help!
- Roaring20s
- Victor V
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:55 am
- Personal Text: Those who were seen dancing were thought insane by those who could not hear the music. Nietzsche
- Location: Tucson, AZ
Re: Tabletop vv-50s sound better than console vv-80s?
When I had a VV-50, I though it an excellent phonograph.
Does your's have the metal or wood horn?
The reproducer on the VV-50 may sound better too.
Have swopped them on the two machines to hear any change in the sound?
James.

Does your's have the metal or wood horn?
The reproducer on the VV-50 may sound better too.
Have swopped them on the two machines to hear any change in the sound?
James.

-
- Victor I
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:13 pm
- Personal Text: I know nothing (yet) help!
Re: Tabletop vv-50s sound better than console vv-80s?
My two VV-50s are both first revision metal horn type except for the lid (which is most certainly another fold in the horn) Same #2 reproducers used on all comparisons.
I will also note that my VV-80s are also the smaller console type. On later VV-80s
the horn would have to be larger. I think the real reason in the fact is the VV-50s have a much longer horn when unfolded.
The subject of acoustic horns is one of the most fascinating studies in physics and well understood.
I will also note that my VV-80s are also the smaller console type. On later VV-80s
the horn would have to be larger. I think the real reason in the fact is the VV-50s have a much longer horn when unfolded.
The subject of acoustic horns is one of the most fascinating studies in physics and well understood.