![[The Talking Machine Forum - For All Antique Phonographs & Recordings]](/styles/we_universal/theme/images/the_talking_machine_forum.png)
The #2 reproducer in my AT may not be the best that Columbia ever made; but I don't think it should sound as coarse and blasty as it does. Of course, I replaced the gaskets; and I've made sure that the stylus bar is secure on the diaphragm (I could find no visible wear on the stylus). Any suggestions on getting the best sound out of it?
Bill
Blasting in a Columbia #2 reproducer
-
Lucius1958
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4036
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
- Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...
-
Amberola 1-A
- Victor II
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:57 pm
- Location: The Granite State
- Contact:
Re: Blasting in a Columbia #2 reproducer
I have noticed that some recordings overload the Reproducer used, regardless if it was rebuilt. Does this occur on all cylinders played?
Bill
Bill
Check with your dealer for the latest Edison Records!
-
Lucius1958
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4036
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
- Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...
Re: Blasting in a Columbia #2 reproducer
So far as I have noticed, it seems to do so....Amberola 1-A wrote:I have noticed that some recordings overload the Reproducer used, regardless if it was rebuilt. Does this occur on all cylinders played?
Bill