U.S. Phonograph Peerless ?

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
mjbarnes
Victor I
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 10:34 am

U.S. Phonograph Peerless ?

Post by mjbarnes »

So how many are in existence? The 275 lb. monster cylinder phonograph!

JohnM
Victor VI
Posts: 3128
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:47 am
Location: Jerome, Arizona
Contact:

Re: U.S. Phonograph Peerless ?

Post by JohnM »

One of which I’m aware, heavily restored over 40 years ago. Used to be in Homer’s Museum in Texas. An empty cabinet was found about 5 years ago. Not sure what happened to it. I’m pretty sure that a ‘Peerless’ doesn’t weigh 375lbs!
"All of us have a place in history. Mine is clouds." Richard Brautigan

Pete Stratford
Victor II
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:12 pm

Re: U.S. Phonograph Peerless ?

Post by Pete Stratford »

Shipping weight with wooden crate 275 lbs
Attachments
IMG_0346.png

edisonclassm
Victor III
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 9:45 am

Re: U.S. Phonograph Peerless ?

Post by edisonclassm »

There is one complete original machine known to exist. I bought it from Bob Fulwider who bought it from Dennis Devine from Council Bluffs, Iowa. I restored it and sold it to Walt Bellm from Florida who had it in his museum. There was another one sold at the Larry Wojtkiewicz auction 20+ years ago in Omaha Nebraska. It was supposed to be complete but had been completely disassembled. I was the underbidder on that one. It disappeared into the collector woodwork and has never resurfaced. A third empty cabinet turned up a few years back and was purchased by a collector in Missouri. As far as I know he installed a US Opera mech in it which is nearly the same as the Peerless mech. Homer Deford of Texas never owned one of these machines. I know that for a fact. As far as the weight of these machines go, it probably weighs in the neighborhood of 80-100lbs. The 275lbs in the above ad is a bit much. I never did get a chance to put mine on the scale! I have to admit this is one spectacular machine!

mjbarnes
Victor I
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 10:34 am

Re: U.S. Phonograph Peerless ?

Post by mjbarnes »

Can anybody post pictures of the mechanics?

JohnM
Victor VI
Posts: 3128
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:47 am
Location: Jerome, Arizona
Contact:

Re: U.S. Phonograph Peerless ?

Post by JohnM »

Here you go.
Attachments
IMG_4099.jpeg
IMG_4099.jpeg (113.02 KiB) Viewed 1414 times
IMG_4098.jpeg
IMG_4098.jpeg (66.49 KiB) Viewed 1414 times
IMG_4097.jpeg
IMG_4097.jpeg (64.63 KiB) Viewed 1414 times
"All of us have a place in history. Mine is clouds." Richard Brautigan

edisonclassm
Victor III
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 9:45 am

Re: U.S. Phonograph Peerless ?

Post by edisonclassm »

Those photos were taken in the mid 80's. I had just finished the restoration and was on my way to Union with the machine. I stopped by my friend's place in Ohio and we unloaded the machine and took photos. So John, where did you dig up those photos?

mjbarnes
Victor I
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 10:34 am

Re: U.S. Phonograph Peerless ?

Post by mjbarnes »

I would like to know why the reproducer -- if that is what it is -- is as long as a cylinder record.

User avatar
mrvic2
Victor I
Posts: 117
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2024 9:31 pm
Personal Text: Tiktok - "scamps" Instagram - "@ppoisonedbasin89"
Location: Maryland, USA
Contact:

Re: U.S. Phonograph Peerless ?

Post by mrvic2 »

mjbarnes wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2025 11:09 pm I would like to know why the reproducer -- if that is what it is -- is as long as a cylinder record.
U.S. Phonograph Company had an interesting system for playing both 2 & 4 minute cylinders on one machine. That round part infront of the assembly let's you choose between one of two reproducers making contact with the record, one having the 2 minute stylus, and one having the 4 minute stylus
"A home without a Victor is a stage without a play."

JerryVan
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6381
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
Location: Southeast MI

Re: U.S. Phonograph Peerless ?

Post by JerryVan »

mrvic2 wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2025 12:50 am
mjbarnes wrote: Mon Feb 17, 2025 11:09 pm I would like to know why the reproducer -- if that is what it is -- is as long as a cylinder record.
U.S. Phonograph Company had an interesting system for playing both 2 & 4 minute cylinders on one machine. That round part in front of the assembly let's you choose between one of two reproducers making contact with the record, one having the 2 minute stylus, and one having the 4 minute stylus
... and they are an absolute nightmare in pot metal.

Post Reply