Based on what I remember hearing, years ago, when I listened to a friend's Cortez in a side by side comparison with a Credenza, the Credenza was the hands down winner -- more apparent bass, a much stronger mid-range, and generally, more "sonic oomph!" As you noted, this was especially apparent when electrical recordings were played. There was speculation, though, that the phonograph might have been designed more to bring out the best of the Light Ray Brunswick records, which were more bass-heavy than Columbia or Victor records.OrthoSean wrote:solophoneman wrote:... They are nice looking machines indeed and they sound pretty decent. Acoustics sound terrific on a Cortez. A Credenza will still blow the doors off of one of these sound wise if you're playing electrics IMHO. ...
Sean
One thing I've always wondered about was why Brunswick opted for the "mirror image" style tonearm--compared to almost all other manufacturers. Seems rather awkward for most right-handed people. (I'm wondering if this was a popular model for the "lefties?"

Also, I no longer remember... Did the Panatrope sound box use a spider as a driver for the diaphragm, or was the center cone area of the diaphragm merely etched for reinforcement?