Model O vs Diamond B reproducers

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Post Reply
mjbarnes
Victor I
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 10:34 am

Model O vs Diamond B reproducers

Post by mjbarnes »

Most of the records I play are Blue Amberols. I have been enjoying a recently rebuilt Model O but notice it chatters on loud, high-frequency sounds. There is quite a lot of surface noise too. Tonight I put on a Diamond B for comparison. Much quieter regarding surface noise, and mellower sounds in general. Is the Diamond B Edison's own mechanical attempt at high-frequency filtering?

JohnM
Victor VI
Posts: 3128
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:47 am
Location: Jerome, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Model O vs Diamond B reproducers

Post by JohnM »

Diamond stylus Edison reproducers were designed specifically for use on celluloid cylinders because of the high heat generated at the top of the stylus due to friction. Diamonds are excellent conductors of heat so there is no heat generated when playing celluloid with a diamond stylus resulting in less record wear.
Sapphire styli are softer and were designed to play wax cylinders that don’t generate as much heat at the stylus. Playing celluloid cylinders with sapphires will wear a flat spot on the sapphire. Don’t play wax cylinders with sapphire styli if you’ve been using them on celluloid. The flat will wear the groove walls.
"All of us have a place in history. Mine is clouds." Richard Brautigan

mjbarnes
Victor I
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 10:34 am

Re: Model O vs Diamond B reproducers

Post by mjbarnes »

Thanks for that info. I will change my practice.

AmberolaAndy
Victor V
Posts: 2594
Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 10:15 pm
Location: A small town near Omaha, Nebraska

Re: Model O vs Diamond B reproducers

Post by AmberolaAndy »

I have a Diamond B LOOOOOONG overdue for a Steve Medved rebuild (Is he still rebuilding them?)

User avatar
Valecnik
Victor VI
Posts: 3857
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
Location: Česká Republika
Contact:

Re: Model O vs Diamond B reproducers

Post by Valecnik »

AmberolaAndy wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 12:35 am I have a Diamond B LOOOOOONG overdue for a Steve Medved rebuild (Is he still rebuilding them?)
Steve is still rebuilding them. Recently he did a Model L for me.

mjbarnes
Victor I
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 10:34 am

Re: Model O vs Diamond B reproducers

Post by mjbarnes »

So what is the best Edison reproducer for playing two-minute celluloid given the problem of stylus wear?

JerryVan
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6380
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
Location: Southeast MI

Re: Model O vs Diamond B reproducers

Post by JerryVan »

mjbarnes wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 8:25 am So what is the best Edison reproducer for playing two-minute celluloid given the problem of stylus wear?
My opinion, which will undoubtedly vary from others, is to use any two-minute capable reproducer, with a known good stylus and in otherwise good condition. Unless you plan to play thousands of records, or one record a thousand times, you have very little to worry about. While I am all for conservation, there are very few two-minute celluloid cylinders that are of such extreme value that they warrant concern over miniscule wear.

User avatar
Valecnik
Victor VI
Posts: 3857
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
Location: Česká Republika
Contact:

Re: Model O vs Diamond B reproducers

Post by Valecnik »

JerryVan wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 9:12 am
mjbarnes wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 8:25 am So what is the best Edison reproducer for playing two-minute celluloid given the problem of stylus wear?
My opinion, which will undoubtedly vary from others, is to use any two-minute capable reproducer, with a known good stylus and in otherwise good condition. Unless you plan to play thousands of records, or one record a thousand times, you have very little to worry about. While I am all for conservation, there are very few two-minute celluloid cylinders that are of such extreme value that they warrant concern over miniscule wear.
I agree the problem is insignificant. It's okay to experiment a little bit. For two minute celluloid an O is a better choice than a C or K. Even with an O you can experience blasting on loud cylinders. If you experience blasting with the O, believe it or not a Diamond B will solve the problem and your cylinders will sound very good.

Post Reply