Blue Amberol vs Regular Amberol

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
Post Reply
User avatar
shopdoc
Victor O
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:06 pm
Personal Text: Edison Specialist
Location: Verona, NJ

Blue Amberol vs Regular Amberol

Post by shopdoc »

We are trying to figure out if dad simply didn't differentiate between types of 4 minute Edison cylinders, and used the blue amberol and regular amberol boxes interchangeably, or if he knew something we don't.

Is the absolute identifying factor of a blue amberol that it is visibly blue? I know they have plaster of paris interiors, but the level of whiteness inside the blue cylinders varies widely.

Likewise, if it appears black and 4 min (and is an Edison) is it definitely a regular amberol? (And sometimes we disagree as to whether they are blue or black.... old eyes)

Another question is, are the blue amberol and regular amberol catalog numbers the same for the same title? Or were they numbered differently?

Thank you for your help.

OrthoFan
Victor V
Posts: 2451
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:12 pm

Re: Blue Amberol vs Regular Amberol

Post by OrthoFan »

The "Blue" Amberol records had a plaster core with a relatively thin layer of celluloid wrapped around it, and were played with an ultra fine diamond stulus. The earlier "Black" four minute Amberol records were a solid wax-like compound--no plaster core--and were played using a fine sapphire stylus. There were color variations in the blue dye, so a careful inspection of the core is the easiest way to tell.

Also see --
https://cylinders.library.ucsb.edu/history-amberol.php
https://cylinders.library.ucsb.edu/hist ... mberol.php

This may also be useful --

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8116
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Blue Amberol vs Regular Amberol

Post by phonogfp »

...and another resource scroll down to the cylinder record section):

https://www.antiquephono.org/#/collectiondetails/16

George P.

User avatar
Lucius1958
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4084
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...

Re: Blue Amberol vs Regular Amberol

Post by Lucius1958 »

The plaster in the earlier Blue Amberols was dyed dark blue, but this was dropped later on. The celluloid itself was different shades of blue, depending on temperature & humidity during dyeing. Around 1913, they tried using a cheaper dye, but that was not successful; the 'faded' BAs (looking like old blue jeans) are from that period.

Rule of thumb: if the core is plaster, it's a BA. If it's the same material as the surface, it's a wax Amberol.

- Bill

User avatar
shopdoc
Victor O
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:06 pm
Personal Text: Edison Specialist
Location: Verona, NJ

Re: Blue Amberol vs Regular Amberol

Post by shopdoc »

phonogfp wrote: Wed Oct 15, 2025 8:47 pm ...and another resource scroll down to the cylinder record section):

https://www.antiquephono.org/#/collectiondetails/16

George P.
Thank you, George. You've pointed me toward some things I hadn't found before.

User avatar
shopdoc
Victor O
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 3:06 pm
Personal Text: Edison Specialist
Location: Verona, NJ

Re: Blue Amberol vs Regular Amberol

Post by shopdoc »

Lucius1958 wrote: Thu Oct 16, 2025 12:04 am The plaster in the earlier Blue Amberols was dyed dark blue, but this was dropped later on. The celluloid itself was different shades of blue, depending on temperature & humidity during dyeing. Around 1913, they tried using a cheaper dye, but that was not successful; the 'faded' BAs (looking like old blue jeans) are from that period.

Rule of thumb: if the core is plaster, it's a BA. If it's the same material as the surface, it's a wax Amberol.

- Bill
I appreciate the very practical tip Bill. The very white plaster of paris insides are easy. I had no idea that some of the insides were dyed. And feeling the difference on the inside rather than just looking was not something I had considered.

Post Reply